Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release 2.46.0, release candidate #1

2023-03-10 Thread Danny McCormick via dev
The release has been finalized, thanks everyone! Thanks, Danny On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 2:38 PM Danny McCormick wrote: > We determined that the same issue exists in the 2.45 release, so we are > going to continue finalizing the release candidate. Thank you for your > patience. > > Thanks, >

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.46.0, release candidate #1

2023-03-10 Thread Ahmet Altay via dev
Thank you! Is there a tracking issue for this known issue? And would the known issues section of the release notes link to that? On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 11:38 AM Danny McCormick via dev < dev@beam.apache.org> wrote: > We determined that the same issue exists in the 2.45 release, so we are >

[GitHub] [beam-site] damccorm merged pull request #641: Publish 2.46.0 release

2023-03-10 Thread via GitHub
damccorm merged PR #641: URL: https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/641 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail:

[GitHub] [beam-site] chamikaramj commented on pull request #641: Publish 2.46.0 release

2023-03-10 Thread via GitHub
chamikaramj commented on PR #641: URL: https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/641#issuecomment-1464371177 LGTM. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To

[GitHub] [beam-site] damccorm commented on pull request #641: Publish 2.46.0 release

2023-03-10 Thread via GitHub
damccorm commented on PR #641: URL: https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/641#issuecomment-1464328242 R: @johnjcasey -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release 2.46.0, release candidate #1

2023-03-10 Thread Danny McCormick via dev
We determined that the same issue exists in the 2.45 release, so we are going to continue finalizing the release candidate. Thank you for your patience. Thanks, Danny On Wed, Mar 8, 2023 at 2:30 PM Danny McCormick wrote: > @Reuven Lax found a new potential regression in > BigQuery I/O, so I

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.46.0, release candidate #1

2023-03-10 Thread Danny McCormick via dev
We determined that the same issue exists in the 2.45 release, so we are going to continue finalizing the release candidate. Thank you for your patience. Thanks, Danny On Wed, Mar 8, 2023 at 3:15 PM Reuven Lax wrote: > We are trying to reproduce and debug the issue we saw to validate whether >

Beam High Priority Issue Report (35)

2023-03-10 Thread beamactions
This is your daily summary of Beam's current high priority issues that may need attention. See https://beam.apache.org/contribute/issue-priorities for the meaning and expectations around issue priorities. Unassigned P1 Issues: https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/25675 [Bug]: Reenable