+1 (binding)
Verified the signatures and checksums of the artifacts and (somewhat
vacuous) source tarball. Also verified the artifact doesn't leak classes
outside apache/beam/vendor .
It'd be great if we could move this artifact creation and signing to CI,
see
+1 (non-binding) verified signature of source release, artifacts (jar,
pom); also tested the staged artifact locally with beam java core
On Mon, Aug 7, 2023 at 1:22 PM Ahmet Altay wrote:
> +1 - I checked the tests on the linked testing PR. Thank you!
>
> On Thu, Aug 3, 2023 at 12:02 PM Yi Hu
+1 - I checked the tests on the linked testing PR. Thank you!
On Thu, Aug 3, 2023 at 12:02 PM Yi Hu via dev wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
>
> Please review the release of the following artifacts that we vendor:
>
>
> * beam-vendor-guava-32_1_2-jre
>
>
> Please review and vote on the release candidate
This is your daily summary of Beam's current high priority issues that may need
attention.
See https://beam.apache.org/contribute/issue-priorities for the meaning and
expectations around issue priorities.
Unassigned P1 Issues:
https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/27648 [Bug]: Python SDFs
