Anyone keen to review this PR:
https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/10413
without this foundation I can't continue with the rest.
_/
_/ Alex Van Boxel
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 11:40 PM Alex Van Boxel wrote:
> Thank you everyone for voting: Accepted by majority vote +1 (7 votes, 3
> binding),
Thank you everyone for voting: Accepted by majority vote +1 (7 votes, 3
binding), -1 (0 votes)
I added the information to the document:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BEAM/%5BBIP-1%5D+Beam+Schema+Options
Now that the 2.20 is frozen it's the ideal moment to get the PR of the
+1 (binding)
Looks like a useful feature to have in schemas and fields. Thank you for
the good write-up.
-Max
On 26.02.20 19:35, Alex Van Boxel wrote:
Nico, thanks for the addition to SQL/MED. I could use another PMC vote
to conclude the vote.
_/
_/ Alex Van Boxel
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020
Nico, thanks for the addition to SQL/MED. I could use another PMC vote to
conclude the vote.
_/
_/ Alex Van Boxel
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 11:25 PM Kenneth Knowles wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Added a link to the wiki proposal for SQL/MED (Management of External
> Data) which treats some of the
+1 (binding)
Added a link to the wiki proposal for SQL/MED (Management of External Data)
which treats some of the same ideas.
Kenn
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 3:02 PM Brian Hulette wrote:
> +1 (non-binding) thanks for all your work on this Alex :)
>
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 6:50 AM Alex Van
+1 (non-binding) thanks for all your work on this Alex :)
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 6:50 AM Alex Van Boxel wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> I assume I can vote on my own proposal :-)
>
> _/
> _/ Alex Van Boxel
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 6:36 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre
> wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
+1 (non-binding)
I assume I can vote on my own proposal :-)
_/
_/ Alex Van Boxel
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 6:36 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Very interesting. It remembers me when we start the discussion about
> schema support ;)
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> Le 20 févr. 2020 à
+1 (binding)
Very interesting. It remembers me when we start the discussion about schema
support ;)
Regards
JB
> Le 20 févr. 2020 à 08:36, Alex Van Boxel a écrit :
>
> Hi all,
>
> let's do a vote on the very first Beam Improvement Proposal. If you have a -1
> or -1 (binding) please add
+1 (non-binding) actually working on some pipelines where this would be
super useful to have now :-)
On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 10:09 PM Robert Burke wrote:
> +1 (non-binding) it feels like a reasonable extension, and portability is
> considered. I see no issues with eventually supporting it in
+1 (non-binding) it feels like a reasonable extension, and portability is
considered. I see no issues with eventually supporting it in the Go SDK
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020, 11:36 PM Alex Van Boxel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> let's do a vote on the very first Beam Improvement Proposal. If you have a
> -1 or
Hi all,
let's do a vote on the very first Beam Improvement Proposal. If you have a
-1 or -1 (binding) please add your concern to the open issues section to
the wiki. Thanks.
This is the proposal:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BEAM/%5BBIP-1%5D+Beam+Schema+Options
Can I have your
11 matches
Mail list logo
