Re: [VOTE] Fixing @yyy.com.INVALID mailing addresses

2017-11-27 Thread Lukasz Cwik
I have confirmed that I am no longer impacted by the .INVALID suffix. On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 3:06 PM, Lukasz Cwik wrote: > Apache infra has mentioned that they have updated the mailing list to > prevent the ".INVALID" from appearing on the end. dev@ now matches user@ > in

Re: [VOTE] Fixing @yyy.com.INVALID mailing addresses

2017-11-27 Thread Lukasz Cwik
Apache infra has mentioned that they have updated the mailing list to prevent the ".INVALID" from appearing on the end. dev@ now matches user@ in this regard. On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Lukasz Cwik wrote: > Vote Closed: > all +1s with at least 3 binding votes. > > On

Re: [VOTE] Fixing @yyy.com.INVALID mailing addresses

2017-11-27 Thread Lukasz Cwik
Vote Closed: all +1s with at least 3 binding votes. On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 6:52 AM, Aljoscha Krettek wrote: > +1 > > > On 23. Nov 2017, at 23:22, Manu Zhang wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 11:32 PM Maximilian Michels

Re: [VOTE] Fixing @yyy.com.INVALID mailing addresses

2017-11-24 Thread Aljoscha Krettek
+1 > On 23. Nov 2017, at 23:22, Manu Zhang wrote: > > +1 > > On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 11:32 PM Maximilian Michels wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Thanks for looking into it! >> >> On 23.11.17 00:25, Lukasz Cwik wrote: >>> I have noticed that some e-mail

Re: [VOTE] Fixing @yyy.com.INVALID mailing addresses

2017-11-23 Thread Manu Zhang
+1 On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 11:32 PM Maximilian Michels wrote: > +1 > > Thanks for looking into it! > > On 23.11.17 00:25, Lukasz Cwik wrote: > > I have noticed that some e-mail addresses (notably @google.com) get > > .INVALID suffixed onto it so per...@yyy.com become >

Re: [VOTE] Fixing @yyy.com.INVALID mailing addresses

2017-11-23 Thread Maximilian Michels
+1 Thanks for looking into it! On 23.11.17 00:25, Lukasz Cwik wrote: > I have noticed that some e-mail addresses (notably @google.com) get > .INVALID suffixed onto it so per...@yyy.com become per...@yyy.com.INVALID > in the From: header. > > I have figured out that this is an issue with the way

Re: [VOTE] Fixing @yyy.com.INVALID mailing addresses

2017-11-23 Thread Ismaël Mejía
+1 On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 6:35 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2017, 10:10 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> On 11/23/2017 12:25 AM, Lukasz Cwik wrote: >> > I have noticed that some e-mail

Re: [VOTE] Fixing @yyy.com.INVALID mailing addresses

2017-11-22 Thread Robert Bradshaw
+1 On Wed, Nov 22, 2017, 10:10 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > +1 > > Regards > JB > > On 11/23/2017 12:25 AM, Lukasz Cwik wrote: > > I have noticed that some e-mail addresses (notably @google.com) get > > .INVALID suffixed onto it so per...@yyy.com become >

Re: [VOTE] Fixing @yyy.com.INVALID mailing addresses

2017-11-22 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 Regards JB On 11/23/2017 12:25 AM, Lukasz Cwik wrote: I have noticed that some e-mail addresses (notably @google.com) get .INVALID suffixed onto it so per...@yyy.com become per...@yyy.com.INVALID in the From: header. I have figured out that this is an issue with the way that our mail

Re: [VOTE] Fixing @yyy.com.INVALID mailing addresses

2017-11-22 Thread Pei HE
+1 On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 8:43 AM, Holden Karau wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 4:06 PM Kenneth Knowles > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Lukasz Cwik > > wrote: > > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Fixing @yyy.com.INVALID mailing addresses

2017-11-22 Thread Holden Karau
+1 (non-binding) On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 4:06 PM Kenneth Knowles wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Lukasz Cwik > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 3:35 PM, Reuven Lax > > wrote: > > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Fixing @yyy.com.INVALID mailing addresses

2017-11-22 Thread Kenneth Knowles
+1 On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Lukasz Cwik wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 3:35 PM, Reuven Lax > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Nov 22, 2017 3:29 PM, "Ben Sidhom" wrote: > > > > > I'm not a PMC member, but

Re: [VOTE] Fixing @yyy.com.INVALID mailing addresses

2017-11-22 Thread Lukasz Cwik
+1 On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 3:35 PM, Reuven Lax wrote: > +1 > > On Nov 22, 2017 3:29 PM, "Ben Sidhom" wrote: > > > I'm not a PMC member, but this would be especially valuable if it > > propagated DKIM signatures properly. > > > > On Wed, Nov

Re: [VOTE] Fixing @yyy.com.INVALID mailing addresses

2017-11-22 Thread Reuven Lax
+1 On Nov 22, 2017 3:29 PM, "Ben Sidhom" wrote: > I'm not a PMC member, but this would be especially valuable if it > propagated DKIM signatures properly. > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Lukasz Cwik > wrote: > > > I have noticed that

Re: [VOTE] Fixing @yyy.com.INVALID mailing addresses

2017-11-22 Thread Ben Sidhom
I'm not a PMC member, but this would be especially valuable if it propagated DKIM signatures properly. On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Lukasz Cwik wrote: > I have noticed that some e-mail addresses (notably @google.com) get > .INVALID suffixed onto it so

[VOTE] Fixing @yyy.com.INVALID mailing addresses

2017-11-22 Thread Lukasz Cwik
I have noticed that some e-mail addresses (notably @google.com) get .INVALID suffixed onto it so per...@yyy.com become per...@yyy.com.INVALID in the From: header. I have figured out that this is an issue with the way that our mail server is configured and opened