Great, I really like the new simplified flow! Thanks for that!
On 08.12.22, 19:48, "Kenneth Knowles" wrote:
Merged it. Please be on the lookout for bugs I have introduced, since they
could result in issues slipping through the cracks. On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 3:
31 PM Kenneth Knowles wrote: OK
Merged it. Please be on the lookout for bugs I have introduced, since they
could result in issues slipping through the cracks.
On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 3:31 PM Kenneth Knowles wrote:
> OK I did my best in https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/24585
>
> Yet another thought I had: Do we really need
OK I did my best in https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/24585
Yet another thought I had: Do we really need multiple templates? Do people
like the tags in the titles? After creation all these things are "just
labels" so there's no particular reason we need to conceptualize issues
as partitioned
+1 to letting conjunctions form naturally.
In the bikeshedding discusion:
That would mean I'm biased to having the reduced label set to have reduced
colours for the general category.
Eg. SDK colour, Runner colour, beam resources colour, and IO being it's own
special unique colour, and awaiting
I like that idea (and the list) as well.
On Tue, Dec 6, 2022 at 1:59 PM Kerry Donny-Clark wrote:
> I really like the idea of multi-select and automatic "awaiting triage".
> Kenn, I think the list you have looks good to me.
>
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2022 at 1:55 PM Kenneth Knowles wrote:
>
>> Noting
I really like the idea of multi-select and automatic "awaiting triage".
Kenn, I think the list you have looks good to me.
On Tue, Dec 6, 2022 at 1:55 PM Kenneth Knowles wrote:
> Noting that what you've listed are the options in the issue template,
> which are then expanded to multiple labels.
Noting that what you've listed are the options in the issue template, which
are then expanded to multiple labels. So focusing on the issue template, I
like the general idea, but maybe we can simplify it even more:
When a user is filing a bug, I think a good outcome is for it to get into
the right
> Is it possible to not have a default option?
Sadly, no AFAIK. I agree this would help. We could try things like making
the default " " and auto-closing issues that don't pick something other
than the default, that's a pretty rough experience though and not worth it
IMO.
> I definitely think
As someone still newer to Beam, I can attest that the number of labels can
be overwhelming.
Is it possible to not have a default option? Even just getting people to
interact with the dropdown might go a long way, especially if the labels
were fewer and clearer.
Bjorn
On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 6:46
I definitely think reducing the label zoo could help. We have a lot of
labels that are decompositions of what used to be Jira components.
Kenn
On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 12:17 PM Danny McCormick via dev
wrote:
> > Previously, we had automation that would automatically mark
> self-assigned
> Previously, we had automation that would automatically mark self-assigned
self-reported issues as triaged. That is probably a third of issues or
more.
I believe that automation exists now[1], but it wasn't retroactively
applied to old issues.
> One issue is that a lot of triage work is getting
I do a regular look at the go label myself. Partly because that's the best
way to learn what to fix next.
On Mon, Dec 5, 2022, 11:57 AM Kenneth Knowles wrote:
> Previously, we had automation that would automatically mark self-assigned
> self-reported issues as triaged. That is probably a third
Previously, we had automation that would automatically mark self-assigned
self-reported issues as triaged. That is probably a third of issues or
more. I'm not sure what else. I appreciate Valentyn keeping an eye on the
Python label. One issue is that a lot of triage work is getting the labels
This is a glorious achievement Kenn! To keep things clean going forward are
there any improvements we can make in our issue creation flow?
On Fri, Dec 2, 2022, 6:44 PM Kenneth Knowles wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've finally done it! I've emptied the label "awaiting triage". Help me
> keep it that
Hi all,
I've finally done it! I've emptied the label "awaiting triage". Help me
keep it that way! This ensures that we actually at least *look* at each
issue once, preferably soon after it is filed. The idea is that you make
sure the priority and other labels are right, since users are not
15 matches
Mail list logo
