"Audo,
> Nicholas" , "Cesar, Scott" <
> scott_ce...@intuit.com>, "Ho, Tom" , "
> d...@samza.apache.org"
> *Subject: *Re: Beam/Samza Ensuring At Least Once semantics
>
>
>
> This email is from an external sender.
>
>
>
XX,
> part=0, offset=106, val: k”, and after some time I see ‘k’ in the output
> topic. So, the records with values ‘g’, ‘h’, ‘I’, ‘j’ are NOT processed.
>
>
>
>
>
> Based on these results I’m incline to conclude that Beam with Samza runner
> does NOT provides 'at least once'
enenson
From: "LeVeck, Matt"
Date: Monday, July 1, 2019 at 5:28 PM
To: "Deshpande, Omkar" , "Benenson, Mikhail"
, Xinyu Liu , Xinyu Liu
, Samarth Shetty , "Audo, Nicholas"
Subject: Beam/Samza Ensuring At Least Once semantics
We’re seeing some behavior
