Re: Python SDK: pytest vs nose

2018-06-28 Thread Mark Liu
Huge +1 to move off from Nose. The last commit to Nose is two years ago which leaves a lot of holes that makes supporting some Beam infra features painful. Vote on pytest since it's more actively maintained than Nose2 (release once a month vs only one for Nose2 this year) and rich of user

Re: Python SDK: pytest vs nose

2018-06-28 Thread Pablo Estrada
I support trying to move away from nose, as it is no longer maintained. I don't know the state of other libraries like pytest or nose2. Best -P On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 3:37 PM Udi Meiri wrote: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3713 > > On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 3:35 PM Udi Meiri

Re: Python SDK: pytest vs nose

2018-06-28 Thread Udi Meiri
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3713 On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 3:35 PM Udi Meiri wrote: > Hi, > I'm currently leaning towards migrating us to pytest, since it has > features like --last-failed, is actively maintained, and seems more > polished in general. > > (Pytest is supposed to be

Python SDK: pytest vs nose

2018-06-28 Thread Udi Meiri
Hi, I'm currently leaning towards migrating us to pytest, since it has features like --last-failed, is actively maintained, and seems more polished in general. (Pytest is supposed to be able to run nose tests, but not all our tests work with it out of the box.) Does anyone have a preference for