Hi,
I just provided feedback in the PRs.
Let me know if you want to chat about some initial implementation (as
I'm the original author of the IO, I remember some discussion in the
past ;) ).
Regards
JB
On 31/10/2019 21:38, Daniel Robert wrote:
> I'm pretty new to the Beam ecosystem, so apologie
Hi Daniel,
I will review and work on this IO.
Sorry for the delay, I wasn't super active on Beam recently, but now back ;)
Regards
JB
On 31/10/2019 21:38, Daniel Robert wrote:
> I'm pretty new to the Beam ecosystem, so apologies if this is not the
> right forum for this.
>
> My team has been l
Regarding review latency, FWIW I'm not super active on Beam these days but
I'll be happy to review 1-2 PRs for RabbitMqIO (I'm @jkff).
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 8:47 PM Kenneth Knowles wrote:
> Yes, thanks for emailing! We very much value sharing your intentions with
> the community. For small cha
Yes, thanks for emailing! We very much value sharing your intentions with
the community. For small changes or fixes, you can just open a PR. For
larger changes that could use feedback from the community (versus just the
code reviewer) this list is the right place to go. If it is truly complex,
a sh
I think we would be happy to see improvements and contributions to .this
component. Emailing this list is definitely the right first step - it gives
anyone with knowledge of the RabbitMqIO component a chance to weigh in. You
don't necessarily have to talk to component authors before submitting a PR
I'm pretty new to the Beam ecosystem, so apologies if this is not the
right forum for this.
My team has been learning and starting to use Beam for the past few
months and have run into myriad problems with the RabbitIO connector for
java, aspects of which seem perhaps fundamentally broken or i
