Re: Performance Testing Next Steps

> .. if the provider we are bringing up also > provides the data store, we can just omit the data store for that benchmark > and use what we've already brought up. Does that answer your question, or > have I misunderstood? Yes, and it is a perfect approach for the case, great idea. > Great point

Re: Performance Testing Next Steps

Excellent proposal, sorry to jump into this discussion so late, this was in my toread list for almost two weeks, and I finally got the time to read the document and I have two minor comments: I have the impression that the strict separation of Providers (the data-processing systems) and Resources

Re: Performance Testing Next Steps

Thanks for writing this and taking care of this, Jason! I'm afraid I also cannot add anything except that I'm excited to see some results from this. On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 at 03:28 Kenneth Knowles wrote: Just got a chance to look this over. I don't have anything to add,

Re: Performance Testing Next Steps

Just got a chance to look this over. I don't have anything to add, but I'm pretty excited to follow this project. Have the JIRAs been filed since you shared the doc? On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Jason Kuster < jasonkus...@google.com.invalid> wrote: > Hey all, just wanted to pop this up

Re: Performance Testing Next Steps

Hey all, just wanted to pop this up again for people -- if anyone has thoughts on performance testing please feel welcome to chime in. :) On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Jason Kuster wrote: > Hi all, > > I've written up a doc on next steps for getting performance