> > Will give it another look tomorrow.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Max
> > >
> > > On 22.11.18 13:07, Maximilian Michels wrote:
> &
> in the Flink
> > > > Runner but in the way the tests utilizes the
> EMBEDDED
> > > environment to
> > > > run
> > > > multiple portable jobs
18 13:07, Maximilian Michels wrote:
> > > Hi Alex,
> > >
> > > The test seems to have gotten flaky after we merged
> support for
> > portable
> > > time
t is
>> > independent of
>> > > the test type (batch and streaming have different
>> > implementations).
>> > >
>> > > Will give it another look tomorrow.
>> > >
>> > >
orrow.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Max
> > >
> > > On 22.11.18 13:07, Maximilian Michels wrote:
> > > > Hi Alex,
> > > >
> > > > The test seems to have g
> > Thanks,
> > Max
> >
> > On 21.11.18 23:56, Alex Amato wrote:
> >> Hello, I have noticed
> >>
that org.apache.beam.runners.flink.PortableTimersExecutionTest
> is very
> >> flakey, and repro'd this
orrow.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Max
>> >
>> > On 22.11.18 13:07, Maximilian Michels wrote:
>> > > Hi Alex,
>> > >
>> > > The test seems to have gotten flaky after we merged supp
le
> > > timers in Flink's batch mode.
> > >
> > > Looking into this now.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Max
> > >
> > > On 21.11.18 23:56, Alex Amato wrote:
> > >> Hello, I have
ged support for
portable
> timers in Flink's batch mode.
>
> Looking into this now.
>
> Thanks,
> Max
>
> On 21.11.18 23:56, Alex Amato wrote:
>> Hello, I have noticed
>> that org.apache.beam.runners.flink.Por
ato wrote:
> >> Hello, I have noticed
> >> that org.apache.beam.runners.flink.PortableTimersExecutionTest is very
> >> flakey, and repro'd this test timeout on the master branch in 40/50
> runs.
> >>
> >> I filed a JIRA issue: BEAM-6111
> >>
Amato wrote:
Hello, I have noticed
that org.apache.beam.runners.flink.PortableTimersExecutionTest is very
flakey, and repro'd this test timeout on the master branch in 40/50 runs.
I filed a JIRA issue: BEAM-6111
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6111>. I was just
wondering if
Hi Alex,
The test seems to have gotten flaky after we merged support for portable
timers in Flink's batch mode.
Looking into this now.
Thanks,
Max
On 21.11.18 23:56, Alex Amato wrote:
Hello, I have noticed
that org.apache.beam.runners.flink.PortableTimersExecutionTest is very
flakey
Hello, I have noticed that
org.apache.beam.runners.flink.PortableTimersExecutionTest
is very flakey, and repro'd this test timeout on the master branch in 40/50
runs.
I filed a JIRA issue: BEAM-6111
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6111>. I was just wondering if
anyone kn
13 matches
Mail list logo
