I have confirmed that I am no longer impacted by the .INVALID suffix.
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 3:06 PM, Lukasz Cwik wrote:
> Apache infra has mentioned that they have updated the mailing list to
> prevent the ".INVALID" from appearing on the end. dev@ now matches user@
> in this regard.
>
> On Mo
Apache infra has mentioned that they have updated the mailing list to
prevent the ".INVALID" from appearing on the end. dev@ now matches user@ in
this regard.
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Lukasz Cwik wrote:
> Vote Closed:
> all +1s with at least 3 binding votes.
>
> On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at
Vote Closed:
all +1s with at least 3 binding votes.
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 6:52 AM, Aljoscha Krettek
wrote:
> +1
>
> > On 23. Nov 2017, at 23:22, Manu Zhang wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 11:32 PM Maximilian Michels
> wrote:
> >
> >> +1
> >>
> >> Thanks for looking into it!
+1
> On 23. Nov 2017, at 23:22, Manu Zhang wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 11:32 PM Maximilian Michels wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Thanks for looking into it!
>>
>> On 23.11.17 00:25, Lukasz Cwik wrote:
>>> I have noticed that some e-mail addresses (notably @google.com) get
>>> .INVALID
+1
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 11:32 PM Maximilian Michels wrote:
> +1
>
> Thanks for looking into it!
>
> On 23.11.17 00:25, Lukasz Cwik wrote:
> > I have noticed that some e-mail addresses (notably @google.com) get
> > .INVALID suffixed onto it so per...@yyy.com become
> per...@yyy.com.INVALID
> >
+1
Thanks for looking into it!
On 23.11.17 00:25, Lukasz Cwik wrote:
> I have noticed that some e-mail addresses (notably @google.com) get
> .INVALID suffixed onto it so per...@yyy.com become per...@yyy.com.INVALID
> in the From: header.
>
> I have figured out that this is an issue with the way
+1
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 6:35 AM, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017, 10:10 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On 11/23/2017 12:25 AM, Lukasz Cwik wrote:
>> > I have noticed that some e-mail addresses (notably @google.com) get
>> > .INVALID suffi
+1
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017, 10:10 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> +1
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 11/23/2017 12:25 AM, Lukasz Cwik wrote:
> > I have noticed that some e-mail addresses (notably @google.com) get
> > .INVALID suffixed onto it so per...@yyy.com become
> per...@yyy.com.INVALID
> > in the Fr
+1
Regards
JB
On 11/23/2017 12:25 AM, Lukasz Cwik wrote:
I have noticed that some e-mail addresses (notably @google.com) get
.INVALID suffixed onto it so per...@yyy.com become per...@yyy.com.INVALID
in the From: header.
I have figured out that this is an issue with the way that our mail server
+1
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 8:43 AM, Holden Karau wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 4:06 PM Kenneth Knowles
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Lukasz Cwik
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 3:35 PM, Reuven Lax
> > > wrote:
>
+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 4:06 PM Kenneth Knowles
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Lukasz Cwik
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 3:35 PM, Reuven Lax
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Nov 22, 2017 3:29 PM, "Ben Sidhom"
> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
+1
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Lukasz Cwik
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 3:35 PM, Reuven Lax
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Nov 22, 2017 3:29 PM, "Ben Sidhom" wrote:
> >
> > > I'm not a PMC member, but this would be especially valuable if it
> > > propagated DKIM signatures proper
+1
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 3:35 PM, Reuven Lax
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Nov 22, 2017 3:29 PM, "Ben Sidhom" wrote:
>
> > I'm not a PMC member, but this would be especially valuable if it
> > propagated DKIM signatures properly.
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Lukasz Cwik
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
+1
On Nov 22, 2017 3:29 PM, "Ben Sidhom" wrote:
> I'm not a PMC member, but this would be especially valuable if it
> propagated DKIM signatures properly.
>
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Lukasz Cwik
> wrote:
>
> > I have noticed that some e-mail addresses (notably @google.com) get
> > .INV
I'm not a PMC member, but this would be especially valuable if it
propagated DKIM signatures properly.
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Lukasz Cwik
wrote:
> I have noticed that some e-mail addresses (notably @google.com) get
> .INVALID suffixed onto it so per...@yyy.com become per...@yyy.com.INV
I have noticed that some e-mail addresses (notably @google.com) get
.INVALID suffixed onto it so per...@yyy.com become per...@yyy.com.INVALID
in the From: header.
I have figured out that this is an issue with the way that our mail server
is configured and opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/brow
16 matches
Mail list logo