Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release 2.31.0, release candidate #1

2021-07-15 Thread Evan Galpin
Hi all, I just ran into some broken links from https://beam.apache.org/documentation/io/built-in/. It appears as though links for IOs are routing to javadocs that don't exist. Ex. https://beam.apache.org/releases/javadoc/2.31.0/org/apache/beam/sdk/io/parquet/ParquetIO.html Maybe javadoc site

[RESULT][VOTE] Release 2.31.0, release candidate #1

2021-07-08 Thread Andrew Pilloud
I'm happy to announce that we have unanimously approved this release. There are 5 approving votes, 4 of which are binding: * Chamikara Jayalath * Ahmet Altay * Kenneth Knowles * Robert Bradshaw There are no disapproving votes. Thanks everyone! I'll be pushing the artifacts today.

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.31.0, release candidate #1

2021-07-07 Thread Kenneth Knowles
+1 ran a couple more validation of configuration that aren't in the scripts, etc. On Fri, Jul 2, 2021 at 6:51 PM Ahmet Altay wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 2, 2021 at 9:57 AM Andrew Pilloud wrote: > >> Thanks for noticing that! The key was updated prior to signature. I need >> a PMC member's help to

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.31.0, release candidate #1

2021-07-02 Thread Andrew Pilloud
Thanks for noticing that! The key was updated prior to signature. I need a PMC member's help to copy the new keys to the release folder: svn cp https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/KEYS https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/ release/beam/KEYS On Fri, Jul 2, 2021 at 9:27 AM Robert Bradshaw

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.31.0, release candidate #1

2021-06-29 Thread Zhitao Li
(non binding) +1, Approve the release >From [TFX](https://github.com/tensorflow/tfx): our automated integration tests >on Python 3.6 and Linux pass without any problem. On 2021/06/29 00:09:41, Andrew Pilloud wrote: > Hi everyone, > Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the

[VOTE] Release 2.31.0, release candidate #1

2021-06-28 Thread Andrew Pilloud
Hi everyone, Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version 2.31.0, as follows: [ ] +1, Approve the release [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments) Reviewers are encouraged to test their own use cases with the release candidate, and vote +1 if no