Sorry for the delay, the vote has passed, with +5 approving votes, and +4
binding PMC votes:
- Kai Jiang
- Pablo Estrada
- Ahmet Altay
- Jean-Baptiste Onofre
- Kenneth Knowles
I will finalize the release today.
Andrew
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 1:35 AM Ismaël Mejía wrote:
> Thanks Brian I
Thanks Brian I see that there are a lot of reasons to do the upgrade,
maybe in the future it would be a good idea to explain the main
motivations of the upgrade for vendored dependencies and refer
relevant JIRAs
On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 6:23 PM Brian Hulette wrote:
>
> There are several jiras
+1 (binding)
Thank you!
For anyone curious, validations of the vendoring process took place on
https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/14146
Kenn
On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 9:23 AM Brian Hulette wrote:
> There are several jiras blocked by a Calcite upgrade. See
>
There are several jiras blocked by a Calcite upgrade. See
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9379
On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 5:17 AM Ismaël Mejía wrote:
> Just out of curiosity is there some feature we are expecting from
> Calcite that pushes this upgrade or is this just catching up for the
Just out of curiosity is there some feature we are expecting from
Calcite that pushes this upgrade or is this just catching up for the
sake of security improvements + not having old dependencies?
On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 12:23 AM Ahmet Altay wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 3:21
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
> Le 8 mars 2021 à 20:37, Andrew Pilloud a écrit :
>
> Hi everyone,
> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for
> beam-vendor-calcite-1_26_0 version 0.1, as follows:
> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide
+1 (binding)
On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 3:21 PM Pablo Estrada wrote:
> +1 (binding) verified signature
>
> On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 12:05 PM Kai Jiang wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 11:37 AM Andrew Pilloud
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>> Please review and vote on the
+1 (binding) verified signature
On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 12:05 PM Kai Jiang wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 11:37 AM Andrew Pilloud
> wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for
>> beam-vendor-calcite-1_26_0 version 0.1, as follows:
>>
+1 (non-binding)
On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 11:37 AM Andrew Pilloud wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for
> beam-vendor-calcite-1_26_0 version 0.1, as follows:
> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
Hi everyone,
Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for
beam-vendor-calcite-1_26_0 version 0.1, as follows:
[ ] +1, Approve the release
[ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
Reviewers are encouraged to test their own use cases with the release
10 matches
Mail list logo
