Re: Launching a Portable Pipeline

2018-05-23 Thread Ankur Goenka
s consensus, so it's probably ready to >>> share >>> :) >>> >>> >> On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 3:00 PM Ankur Goenka >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Thanks for all the input. >>> >>> I have summarized the discussion

Re: Launching a Portable Pipeline

2018-05-23 Thread Thomas Weise
gt;>> >> Thanks Ankur, I think there's consensus, so it's probably ready to >>> share >>> :) >>> >>> >> On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 3:00 PM Ankur Goenka >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Thanks for all the input. >>>

Re: Launching a Portable Pipeline

2018-05-23 Thread Reuven Lax
e conclusion on the mailing list. >> >> >>> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 1:51 PM Eugene Kirpichov < >> kirpic...@google.com> >> wrote: >> >> >>>> Thanks Ankur, this document clarifies a few points and raises some >> very impor

Re: Launching a Portable Pipeline

2018-05-23 Thread Ankur Goenka
8 at 12:34 PM Ankur Goenka > wrote: > > >>>>> Updated link to the document as the previous link was not working for > some people. > > > >>>>> On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 7:56 PM Ankur Goenka > wrote: > > >>>>>> Hi, > > >>>>>> Recent effort on portability has introduced JobService and > ArtifactService to the beam stack along with SDK. This has open up a few > questions around how we start a pipeline in a portable setup (with > JobService). > >>>>>> I am trying to document our approach to launching a portable > pipeline and take binding decisions based on the discussion. > >>>>>> Please review the document and provide your feedback. > > >>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>> Ankur >

Re: Launching a Portable Pipeline

2018-05-23 Thread Ismaël Mejía
as the previous link was not working for some people. >>>>> On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 7:56 PM Ankur Goenka wrote: >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> Recent effort on portability has introduced JobService and ArtifactService to the beam stack along with SDK. This

Re: Launching a Portable Pipeline

2018-05-22 Thread Ankur Goenka
ous link was not working for some people. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 7:56 PM Ankur Goenka wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> Recent effort on portability has introduced JobService and >>>&

Re: Launching a Portable Pipeline

2018-05-22 Thread Eugene Kirpichov
ri, May 11, 2018 at 7:56 PM Ankur Goenka wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Recent effort on portability has introduced JobService and >>>> ArtifactService to the beam stack along with SDK. This has open up a few >>>> questions arou

Re: Launching a Portable Pipeline

2018-05-18 Thread Ankur Goenka
> questions around how we start a pipeline in a portable setup (with >>> JobService). >>> I am trying to document our approach to launching a portable pipeline >>> and take binding decisions based on the discussion. >>> Please review the document and provide your feedback. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Ankur >>> >>

Re: Launching a Portable Pipeline

2018-05-14 Thread Eugene Kirpichov
ort on portability has introduced JobService and >> ArtifactService to the beam stack along with SDK. This has open up a few >> questions around how we start a pipeline in a portable setup (with >> JobService). >> I am trying to document our approach to launching a portable pipeline

Re: Launching a Portable Pipeline

2018-05-14 Thread Ankur Goenka
JobService and ArtifactService > to the beam stack along with SDK. This has open up a few questions around > how we start a pipeline in a portable setup (with JobService). > I am trying to document our approach to launching a portable pipeline and > take binding decisions based on the disc

Fwd: Launching a Portable Pipeline

2018-05-11 Thread Ankur Goenka
Hi, Recent effort on portability has introduced JobService and ArtifactService to the beam stack along with SDK. This has open up a few questions around how we start a pipeline in a portable setup (with JobService). I am trying to document our approach to launching a portable pipeline and take