+Amit, Aljoscha, Manu
Any comments from folks on the Flink, Spark, or Gearpump runners?
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Robert Bradshaw <
rober...@google.com.invalid> wrote:
> Being able to "late-bind" parameters like input paths to a
> pre-constructed program would be a very useful feature,
+1
I definitely think it is important to support spark 1 and 2 simultaneously,
and I agree that side-by-side seems the best way to do it. I'll refrain
from commenting on the specific technical aspects of the two runners and
focus just on the split: I am also curious about the answer to Dan's
Hello Beam community,
We (myself, Daniel Mills and Robert Bradshaw) would like to propose
"Splittable DoFn" - a major generalization of DoFn, which allows processing
of a single element to be non-monolithic, i.e. checkpointable and
parallelizable, as well as doing an unbounded amount of work per
