Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Beam, version 0.2.0-incubating

2016-08-05 Thread P. Taylor Goetz
+1 (binding) - built from source - “incubating” in file name - NOTICE and LICENSE look good - license headers present - no wayward binaries - signatures check out -Taylor > On Aug 1, 2016, at 12:46 PM, Dan Halperin wrote: > > Hey folks! > > Here's the vote for the second release of Apache Bea

Utility for Serializing PipelineOptions

2016-08-03 Thread P. Taylor Goetz
Looking at the runner implementations for Spark, Flink, and Gearpump, they all have the same requirement of being able to serialize/deserialize PipelineOptions, and they each seem to use slightly different approaches. In working on a Beam runner for Storm I have the same requirement, and imagine

Re: [PROPOSAL] IRC or slack channel for Apache Beam

2016-08-02 Thread P. Taylor Goetz
Can I get an invite to the slack channel? I’m in the early stages of implementing a Beam runner for Apache Storm and have some (probably stupid ;) ) questions. Also, would it make sense to document the process on the Beam website so new users/devs can find out about it and how to join? -Taylor

Re: 0.1.0-incubating release

2016-06-08 Thread P. Taylor Goetz
d stage using mvn release:prepare release:perform > - Close repo > - Start vote > - If passed, forward vote to incubator > - If passed, close repo > - Upload distro to dist > - Announce the release (mailing lists, website) > > It's based on what I do in Karaf, ServiceMix, etc.

Re: 0.1.0-incubating release

2016-06-07 Thread P. Taylor Goetz
Out of curiosity, is there a reason for distributing the release on repository.a.o vs. dist.a.o? In my experience repository.a.o has traditionally been used for maven artifacts, and dist.a.o has been for release artifacts (source archives and convenience binaries). I'd be happy to help with do

Re: Permission problems

2016-03-04 Thread P. Taylor Goetz
Any of your mentors ought to be able to take care of this for you. When you need help from mentors, it sometimes helps to prepend “[MENTORS]” to the subject to get their attention. -Taylor > On Mar 4, 2016, at 4:17 PM, Davor Bonaci wrote: > > This is something that JB took care for us. I beli

Re: Apache Storm Runner for Beam?

2016-02-10 Thread P. Taylor Goetz
gt; On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 4:50 PM, Yang, Connie wrote: >>> >>> Hi Taylor, >>> >>> Good news indeed that the upcoming Storm 1.0 release will include sliding >>> and tumble windowing. >>> >>> Subash and I would definitely interested in

Re: Apache Storm Runner for Beam?

2016-02-10 Thread P. Taylor Goetz
Hi Connie, I've definitely considered it (no implementation yet, just thoughts), and would like to start coordinating such an effort. That's one of the reasons I wanted to get involved with Beam. A Storm runner would likely/definitely depend on features in the upcoming 1.0 release (namely Mill