Great summary.
And good idea for a meeting (even if only mailing list counts ;)).
Regards
JB
On Aug 10, 2016, 06:09, at 06:09, Frances Perry wrote:
>So to summarize where I think this thread is at -- we'd like to more
>clearly lay out the expectations for larger
I didn't have a specific rubric, but here are some factors:
- Impact on users
- Impact on other devs (while we are incubating, this is possibly a big
deal)
- Backwards compatibility (not that important until stable release if it
is minor)
- Amount of detail needed to understand the proposal
+1 for a more formal "Improvement Proposals" with ids we can refer to:
like Flink does too:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Flink+Improvement+Proposals
On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> Same think at Karaf:
Same think at Karaf: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KARAF/
Combine with Jira.
Regards
JB
On 08/08/2016 10:03 AM, Aljoscha Krettek wrote:
Please have a look at this:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Kafka+Improvement+Proposals
We recently started using this
Please have a look at this:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Kafka+Improvement+Proposals
We recently started using this process in Flink and so far are quite happy
with it.
On Mon, 8 Aug 2016 at 06:52 Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Good point Ben.
>
> I would
Good point Ben.
I would say a "discussion" Jira can "evolve" to a implementation "Jira"
(just changing the component).
WDYT ?
Regards
JB
On 08/08/2016 06:50 AM, Ben Chambers wrote:
Would we use the same Jira to track the series of PRs implementing the
proposal (if accepted) or would it be
Me too ;)
What I'm doing in other Apache projects (like Karaf) is a Jira component
named "discussion" where I describe the discussion and attach the
related documents.
So, with a quick query, we can find all pending discussion, etc.
My $0.01
Regards
JB
On 08/08/2016 06:47 AM, Frances
Would we use the same Jira to track the series of PRs implementing the
proposal (if accepted) or would it be discussion only (possibly linked to
the implementation tasks)?
On Sun, Aug 7, 2016, 9:48 PM Frances Perry wrote:
> I'm a huge fan of keeping all the details