On Jan 28, 2007, at 3:43 PM, Matthias Basler wrote:
James Howison wrote:
From time to time users are going to want to drop out of the style
defined ways of citing and use the flags themselves (ie I like this
style in general, but I want a comma instead of a semi-colon
separating the
On Jan 28, 2007, at 3:55 PM, Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
I, for example, don't see why we should allow users to change the
delimiter for a citation per James' example above.
Ahem, just to be clear, I mean *locally.* E.g. I don't see why the
global configuration of a style says the citation should
On Jan 28, 2007, at 4:03 PM, Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
On Jan 28, 2007, at 3:55 PM, Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
I, for example, don't see why we should allow users to change the
delimiter for a citation per James' example above.
Ahem, just to be clear, I mean *locally.* E.g. I don't see why the
Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
Ahem, just to be clear, I mean *locally.* E.g. I don't see why the
global configuration of a style says the citation should be (Doe,
1999), and we have to allow users to be able to have some citations be
(Doe:1999), *and* to remain live and updateable.
However, IF a user
On Jan 28, 2007, at 5:45 PM, Gannon Dick wrote:
As I see it, there are several reasons to keep locale. None are
related to computer processing, but rather Library Science.
Locale for the source metadata, sure, but I'm still unclear why the
citation field itself needs it.
Bruce
