Re: [dev-biblio] Re: [xbiblio-devel] csl changes

2006-02-10 Thread Bruce D'Arcus
On Feb 10, 2006, at 8:24 AM, Matthias Basler wrote: Yes, abbreviations for journal names are quite common. Implementation should not be very difficult. In a simple case each user can him/herself define a replacement (or alias) list (i.e. Journal of Climatology - J. Clim.) that can be switched

Re: [dev-biblio] Re: [xbiblio-devel] csl changes

2006-02-10 Thread Peter . Dudek
Plus, I was thinking, should there be support for shortened journal names? Like J. Clim. and then every one knows it is the Journal of Climatology? Will be very tough to implement though, as I don't think there even exists a list with all valid shortenings. Just a thought... Yes,

Re: [dev-biblio] Re: [xbiblio-devel] csl changes

2006-02-09 Thread Matthias Basler
Zitat von Bruce D'Arcus [EMAIL PROTECTED]: The final issue is about the prefix/suffix thing. Should they be plain text (as they are now), or should I allow them to have formatting attached to them? I'd definitely prefer the version below, for exactly this reason. Bear in mind that the XML

Re: [dev-biblio] Re: [xbiblio-devel] csl changes

2006-02-09 Thread Bruce D'Arcus
On Feb 9, 2006, at 4:37 AM, Matthias Basler wrote: I'd definitely prefer the version below, for exactly this reason. OK, then, I modified the schema and wrote an XSLT to mostly convert the old examples. For now I've put it all here: http://www.users.muohio.edu/darcusb/citations/csl/

Re: [dev-biblio] Re: [xbiblio-devel] csl changes

2006-02-08 Thread Bruce D'Arcus
On Feb 8, 2006, at 6:12 PM, Johan Kool wrote: Focus on getting it easily readable for your own parser, as well as the human eye. If it works for that, it works for a GUI too. OK, then, I think that's settled. The final issue is about the prefix/suffix thing. Should they be plain text (as