On Fri October 14 2005 12:03, Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
For those of you doing any work with Python, could you perhaps update
me on the status of the Python support in OOo, particularly with
respect to the UNO bridge? Rob has reported it was basically unusable
awhile back. Am just wondering if
I wonder what his justification was for saying that. As far as I know pyUNO is
being used in many production environments.
My justifications:
1) You still can't have a distribution with more than one python file.
For example, I can't have a python script that includes another file
that isn't
On 10/15/05, Robert Sanderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
3) Importing binary packages often failed, even if they were
distributed with the OOo python (eg socket, regular expressions, etc)
Joerg's response was: The std library is not my problem.
I've been learning that the not my problem
For those of you doing any work with Python, could you perhaps update
me on the status of the Python support in OOo, particularly with
respect to the UNO bridge? Rob has reported it was basically unusable
awhile back. Am just wondering if that has improved with 2.0, or if we
need to do some
