Re: [dev-biblio] Re: [users-biblio] JabRef - OpenOffice integration
Hi all, David Wilson wrote: On Thu, 6 Dec 2007, Bruce D'Arcus wrote: So I'd like to see if we can work with developers from Zotero, JabRef, etc. to enhance that baseline support. If out that some other developer start to build the integrated tool we originally envisioned, that's great. But I don't think we can depend on that panning out. And in any case, as I say, it's not an either/or choice; just a question of immediate priorities. Bruce As a start, I have set up a wiki page to assist in the managing of Zotero plugin issues. There is not much there yet and I invite interested people to add to it. http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Zotero_Plugin I strongly suggest moving this page to a new location, something like: http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Bibliographic_Project/Plugins/Zotero instead of creating such orphaned pages. All bibliographic wiki-pages should be ultimately moved below the top-level page 'Bibliographic_Project'. I hope nobody gets annoyed by this quibbling about the wiki-structure. As you know, I am rather focused on the hierarchical organisation of data (http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Bib-Keywords), and this makes sense. It becomes much easier to navigate such sites, see e.g. http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Writer/ToDo/Layout/Multi_Page_Layout where one easily can navigate back to the top-level Writer page. [http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Writer] I hope therefore, that all project leads will enforce this style and improve existing wikis by moving orphaned pages below the top-level project's wiki-page. Sincerely, Leonard regards David - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev-biblio] Re: [users-biblio] JabRef - OpenOffice integration
On Sun, 9 Dec 2007, Leonard Mada wrote: I strongly suggest moving this page to a new location, something like: http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Bibliographic_Project/Plugins/Zote ro instead of creating such orphaned pages. Leonard, Thanks for the the suggestion. When I started the wiki pages I just copied what most other people were doing - which was a flat file structure with any hierarchy built using category links. I can see there advantages in moving to a hierarchical directory organisation. Are there any objections to my restructuring the wiki pages in this way ? regards David On Sun, 9 Dec 2007, Leonard Mada wrote: All bibliographic wiki-pages should be ultimately moved below the top-level page 'Bibliographic_Project'. I hope nobody gets annoyed by this quibbling about the wiki-structure. As you know, I am rather focused on the hierarchical organisation of data (http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Bib-Keywords), and this makes sense. It becomes much easier to navigate such sites, see e.g. http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Writer/ToDo/Layout/Multi_Page_Layo ut where one easily can navigate back to the top-level Writer page. [http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Writer] I hope therefore, that all project leads will enforce this style and improve existing wikis by moving orphaned pages below the top-level project's wiki-page. Sincerely, Leonard regards David - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- --- David N. Wilson Co-Project Lead for the Bibliographic OpenOffice.org Project http://bibliographic.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[dev-biblio] Hierarchical wiki
Hi David, David Wilson wrote: On Sun, 9 Dec 2007, Leonard Mada wrote: I strongly suggest moving this page to a new location, something like: http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Bibliographic_Project/Plugins/ Zotero instead of creating such orphaned pages. Leonard, Thanks for the suggestion. When I started the wiki pages I just copied what most other people were doing - which was a flat file structure with any hierarchy built using category links. I can see there advantages in moving to a hierarchical directory organisation. Are there any objections to my restructuring the wiki pages in this way ? No objections from me. Actually, I strongly encourage it. I already did some work on the Writer and Calc pages (http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Writer and http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Calc), while Tony Galmiche (and others) did an excellent job for the Chart2 wiki (see http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Chart2). There is still a lot to do, but if every project lead enforces this style for his project, then things will only improve. I remember when I first come to OOo: it was genuine luck to find any useful information. So I hope these were past times and newbies will fare nowadays better. [My biggest problem is the very limited time, otherwise I would have moved much more pages around. ;-) ] Sincerely, Leonard regards David - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
