Re: [dev-biblio] Join

On 1/28/06, jper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I would like to join. I work at the Library of Congress and I am interested > in supporting you project. Hi Jim, Welcome aboard. Tell us more about your interests and skills. Bruce -

[dev-biblio] Join

I would like to join. I work at the Library of Congress and I am interested in supporting you project.   Jim Perkins 202-707-9617 Technology Assesment Office Office of Strategic Initiatives

[dev-biblio] Re: biblio ontology

On 1/27/06, Bruce D'Arcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Start of the documented version of an RDF ontology is here: > > I decided to move it here: Bruce ---

[dev-biblio] Re: porting citeproc; wanna help?

On Jan 28, 2006, at 10:43 AM, Bruce D'Arcus wrote: I really don't care whether it's Python or Ruby, since both are object-oriented, and both are easy to read. At any rate, ultimately I'd like to see both citeproc-rb (think a module that could be included trivially in rails apps for example),

[dev-biblio] porting citeproc; wanna help?

I, with some help from David, have been playing with porting citeproc to Ruby. I also experimented a bit with Python, but I'm not much of a programmer and so need all the help I can get, and Ruby is more intuitive to me. Anyway, the stage where I'm at is that this simple method call:

Re: [dev-biblio] biblio ontology

Oh, also, wherever possible I defined classes in relation to wordnet. Right now I think that is English-only, but I expect that to change in the future, so that would be another way to internationalization. Bruce - To unsubscr

Re: [dev-biblio] biblio ontology

Hi Matthias, On Jan 28, 2006, at 4:56 AM, Matthias Basler wrote: Just some quick comments: 1. I am missings "handbook/manual" in your type list. And when you're at it, you could add "painting" as well... and "RSS feed"? In the end you'll have to acknowledge that new types of documents may a

Re: [dev-biblio] biblio ontology

Zitat von Bruce D'Arcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Start of the documented version of an RDF ontology is here: > > I've just decided to model the basic classes; the sort of thing I'd do > anyway if I was writing some web app, or using RDF. But