Re: [dev-biblio] Re: [users-biblio] Work documents on the wiki.

[Matt Price]

On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 04:53:22PM +1100, David Wilson wrote:
 On Friday 31 March 2006 9:41 am, Matt Price wrote:
 
  I'm just thinking that if we (I know the first person is a bit iffy
  here, as I'm hardly active) can start parcelling the project up a bit
  better, we might find that there are a fair number of bits that non-C
  programmers can work on.
 I am open to suggestions on how to do this. I have had list of tasks up on 
 the 
 web site for some years - with not many takers. But we also need to develop 
 and document the tasks much better than we have so that people can assess 
 what they would be getting themselves into. 
 
 CPH is doing some good work documenting the biblio coding.

I think now that someone (CPH!) is actually starting to work on
reconding the writer bits, it becomes apparent, at least to me, how
much other stuff still needs to be done and I think if (as you
suggest) the tasks arebetter defined and documented the chances of
getting folks to slice off bits  takethem on, are higher.

gotta run.
matt


 
 
  Matt
 
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

--
 .''`.   Matt Price 
: :'  :  Debian User
`. `'`hemi-geek
  `- 
-- 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [dev-biblio] Re: [users-biblio] Work documents on the wiki.

[Bruce D'Arcus]

I just went through and added comments throughout the requirements. I 
do think it still could use a fair bit of editing and maybe 
reorganization. I feel like we need to cut it down by about 50%, which 
mostly means consolidating and sharpening.


It strikes me some of the requirements are in fact use cases.

Bruce

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]