Hi Folks,
I've just been going through the list archives some ofthe wiki
documents trying to figure out some priorities for all this work that
lies ahead. Seems to me it would be useful to define several targets --
say minimal, intermediate, and polished and lay out what needs to
be done for
On Apr 4, 2006, at 3:46 PM, Matt Price wrote:
Seems to me it would be useful to define several targets --
say minimal, intermediate, and polished and lay out what needs to
be done for each.
Sure.
Minimal Bibliographic Interface
Target Goals: Allow expert users to insert useful citations
Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
my question: what is lost when info is embedded rather than fetched?
Not much.
Synchronization with further modifications of the database -- when I open
five years old document, I would like it to reflect all updates and
corrections I made into my central bibliographic
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 08:42:30AM +1000, David Wilson wrote:
Matt,
In the the developer Page
(
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Bibliographic_Project's_Developer_Page
)
Stage 1, was intended as the 'minimal' requirement. And Stage 2 as the
intermediate . I can see it
On Apr 4, 2006, at 9:58 PM, Matt Price wrote:
ah. that's really excellent, thank you. This also pointed me to
wiki/Bibliographic_Document_XML_Format which I had skimmed over
before, but is now much clearer to me.
FYI, I just changed the bib example to reflect the current direction of
On Wednesday 05 April 2006 1:02 pm, Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
Also CiteProc is working right now using data stored in an eXist xml
database.
The quickest way to build something that works would be to build a
xforms
based browser to work with eXist and a function to inset the selected
On Wednesday 05 April 2006 6:40 am, Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
On Apr 4, 2006, at 3:54 PM, Matt Price wrote:
comment: seems to me that it might be a good idea to start some of the
actual deletion/consolidation suggested by Bruce or others. WHile
fairly exhaustive, the document is currently