On 4/21/06, David Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I notice you have converted role (Author, Editor etc) from a table of role > types , in earlier models, to a field in Contributions in this model. I > think it there should be a table. Even if it was not linked into the database > it could used for the pick-list for the user interface and could be thus > extended without programming changes.
Yeah, it's just that Rails has out-of-box for this sort of subclassing, where by default if there's a type column, it uses that to create the objects. I agree ultimately it'd probably be better to store those in their own tables. Am just not there yet. Bruce --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
