So based on back-and-forth with the product manager responsible for the new bib support in Word 2007*:
1) they won't support footnote/endnote citations in v1 2) seems (?) they don't support first/subsequent distinctions in author-year 3) they think it perfectly fine to have styles implemented in raw XSLT (they don't appear interested in using CSL or a CSL-like abstraction) So this tells us where we can differentiate OOo. There's going to be a lot of frustration with their default support, particularly among the historians. Also, on 3, it should possible to swap in a citeproc-like solution, and so get support for CSL in Word through the back door. Hmm ... wonder if I should try to productize citeproc for the Word market? ;-) Bruce * see comments at <http://blogs.msdn.com/joe_friend/archive/2006/07/13/664960.aspx> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
