Re: [dev-biblio] Re: [sw-discussion] Re: zotero and OOo

2007-02-16 Thread Leonard Mada

Gannon Dick wrote:

My favorite: http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/coding/citationtags.htm


I missed this one, too. There is even more interesting information, e.g. 
the Journal Tag Library explained, see:
http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/tag-library/2.2/index.html for the 
details and also

http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/index.html for further informations.

It seems that there is even a category *article-type*, one of the things 
that I have advocated on the wiki page 
(http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Bib-Keywords), though some 
types are NOT as much expanded as in my version; especially the *trials* 
subtypes are lacking:


   * randomized controlled trial
   * Meta-analysis
   * other trial

This is interesting information, surely very useful for the Bib project.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [dev-biblio] Re: [sw-discussion] Re: zotero and OOo

2007-02-16 Thread Gannon Dick

--- Leonard Mada [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Gannon Dick wrote:
  My favorite:
 http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/coding/citationtags.htm
 
 I missed this one, too. There is even more interesting information,
 e.g. 
 the Journal Tag Library explained, see:
 http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/tag-library/2.2/index.html for the 
 details and also
 http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/index.html for further
 informations.

 
You refer to the Journal Publishing DTD which in turn is part of a
larger project ...  

 It seems that there is even a category *article-type*, one of the
 things 
 that I have advocated on the wiki page 
 (http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Bib-Keywords), though some 
 types are NOT as much expanded as in my version; especially the
 *trials* 
 subtypes are lacking:
 
 * randomized controlled trial
 * Meta-analysis
 * other trial

Yes, there is @article-type, a mimmic of the biblio table in OO, but
also @section-type which is more interesting to me because the
categories correspond to the headings of a Structured Abstract which
many Journals require nowadays.  RTC and other clinical methods are
recognized levels of Evidence Based Medicine, Evidence Based Health
Care and Evidence Based Librarianship.
I think ODF has the rare opportunity to avoid becomming as fussy as its
cousins, Docbook and the NCBI Publishing Suite you mentioned above, and
yet still satisfy the strictest standards.  The elements necessary
already exist in OO 2.1, it is only necessary that you see them for
what they are.

Consider that 
1) a tag is nothing more than a citation fragment and although the
biblio db table leaves something to be desired for complete citations,
it easily handles tags, types, classes and flat (string literal) meta
data.

2) relation is the new title.  Relational Links can be written as
HTML microformat anchor tags but stored, made persistant, as
text:bibliographic-mark's in ODF.

Everything necessary to make persistant classification marks on an ODF
document is already there.



 


 

Be a PS3 game guru.
Get your game face on with the latest PS3 news and previews at Yahoo! Games.
http://videogames.yahoo.com/platform?platform=120121

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]