On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 12:57 AM, dnw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The most useful activity you could do at this time would be to work with the
Zotero team to fix the Zotero plugin/ extension for OpenOffice version 3.
FYI, the Zotero devs have been working on a new version of the plug-in
to cover
Just a reminder to any developers out their that might want to
contribute to enhancing bibliographic support in OOo, there's still
work to be done by somebody in upgrading Zotero's OOo integration to
support OOo 3.0, including the new Mac port. Am really not even sure
what's involved in doing
Anyone have any ideas about the bug outlined here?
http://forums.zotero.org/discussion/3349/openoffice-30-macro-error/
TIA,
Bruce
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 7:39 AM, Michael Stahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Am *really* not sure about this, but I wonder if it would make sense to
consider the document itself a graph?
hmmm, interesting idea.
If I understand the RDF model correctly, then a document would have a
I asked Dan Stillman at the Zotero project if there was anything we
could do here to do to help with development, maintenance, or support
of the Zotero plug-in for OOo. His answer was:
As for maintenance and support, we'd certainly appreciate any
development work from the OOo project in keeping
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree that the bibliographic functionning need not be within
OpenOffice,
however just to remind you : Zotero is not the only working example
out there , Bibus integrates nicely with OO and Word without using
the OO integrated database.
True enough.
But to be
On Dec 5, 2007 7:55 PM, David Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Currently there are complexities involved with Zotero and other 3rd party
bibliographic apps in sharing documents and the related bibliographic data,
which would be greatly reduced with an integrated bibliographic facility.
Well,
On Dec 4, 2007 2:42 PM, Morten Omholt Alver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been working on a plugin for integrating JabRef better with
OpenOffice.org via the UNO interface (to clarify: it's a plugin for
JabRef - which will support plugins from the next version). It's far
from finished, but
Matt Price wrote:
...
my main interest in broaching the subject is to help my colleagues, who
all use endnote, to move to openoffice.
Hmm ... I guess that depends.
Do your colleagues express interest in moving away from Word? If yes,
what kinds of sacrifices are they willing to make to
Matt Price wrote:
does anyone know more about this?
...
* Formatting support for Open Document Type (ODT) files using the
Format Paper command
No, but I'd speculate that the support is something like what you'd get
with RTF. E.g. not what you'd get with MS Word, or using
On 11/2/07, Matthew Yates [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
As I said, I think this is great. My graduate
students use MS Word and EndNote, while I use
Openoffice.org on Linux for most things. Since this
appears to work (almost) flawlessly in wine, I think I
may be able to switch my group over
For those interested in using Zotero with OOo, see:
http://www.zotero.org/documentation/word_processor_integration
The goal of the support last I heard (I don't have time to test the
latest version) is that it not only be equivalent to the MS Word
support, but that it be possible to
Matthias Steffens wrote:
My tendency has been to think in terms like libraries think;
more about the physical form. So a book is always a document,
whether it includes separate items or not.
Good for me.
I agree that clearly defining the words collection and container
is important. The
On Jun 15, 2007, at 7:40 PM, David Wilson wrote:
As I understand them, the current proposals for the OOo Bib Project
would
allow for the selection of and retention of disparate fonts and font
sizes
within citation and citation prefixes and suffixes.
We've not settled on the precise
An update from the Zotero guys about work (by Ian Laurenson) on
integrating Zotero with OOo.
http://forums.zotero.org/discussion/804/word-plugin-status-update
Bruce
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
It seems we're (finally!) about wrapped up with the ODF metadata work
on which we'll base the new citation support. To make a long story
short, we've realized that likely the easiest way to proceed with the
details of formatting is that Writer has an API which knows how to
track citations,
On Mar 20, 2007, at 7:12 PM, David Wilson wrote:
A couple of questions come to mind-
1. Locator formatting (page numbers etc). If CiteProc is handling the
locator
formatting I would guess that intend that the RDF in package would
look like:
b:Book rdf:about=urn:isbn:34982376:123-128#An
On Mar 20, 2007, at 10:19 PM, David Wilson wrote:
I am leaning towards not supporting traditional flags of this sort,
with the idea that they're more trouble than they're worth, for both
author and programmer.
I am not sure what you mean precisely. Do you mean 'by not supporting
traditional
The dbus vs. uno stuff is beyond me, but ...
On Feb 12, 2007, at 3:54 PM, Mathias Bauer wrote:
Currently we are talking about Zotero. They are using SOAP and this is
fine for both MSOffice and OOo as well. And I don't see a reason that
KOffice can't use it that way. So I would go for it. SOAP
On Feb 10, 2007, at 9:20 PM, David Wilson wrote:
I put together my ideas about possible Citeproc - Writer Interaction
at
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Citeproc_Writer_Interaction
I think we might need to pull back and get more abstract to address
Mathias' question? It seems
Germany - ham02 - Hamburg
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: February 1, 2007 8:50:49 AM EST
To: Bruce D'Arcus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: office Office [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [office] data templating (and citations)
Hi Bruce,
Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
Hi Michael,
On Feb 1, 2007, at 5:45 AM, Michael Brauer
On 1/29/07, James Howison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a use-case that might be useful for considering the range of
formatting requirements for the in-page citation. Jurabib offers a
way to have an abbreviation of the full author show up in author-year
type styles. Can CSL handle that?
No,
On 1/30/07, Leonard Mada [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Instead of having flags for every citation field, I suggested:
- have styles for citations
- AND allow more than one citation styles in the same document
-- styles are set globally (therefore, IF one decides to change a
style, he changes all
On Jan 28, 2007, at 3:43 PM, Matthias Basler wrote:
James Howison wrote:
From time to time users are going to want to drop out of the style
defined ways of citing and use the flags themselves (ie I like this
style in general, but I want a comma instead of a semi-colon
separating the
On Jan 28, 2007, at 3:55 PM, Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
I, for example, don't see why we should allow users to change the
delimiter for a citation per James' example above.
Ahem, just to be clear, I mean *locally.* E.g. I don't see why the
global configuration of a style says the citation should
On Jan 28, 2007, at 5:45 PM, Gannon Dick wrote:
As I see it, there are several reasons to keep locale. None are
related to computer processing, but rather Library Science.
Locale for the source metadata, sure, but I'm still unclear why the
citation field itself needs it.
Bruce
Hi CPH,
On Jan 27, 2007, at 8:02 AM, CPHennessy wrote:
I'm not sure if it makes sense but would the smarttags feature which
was
recently added be useful to develope the citation component ?
Yeah, maybe. A few months ago I talked to the guys who were working on
this about our work and the
Well, here's the citation field switches in Microsoft's Open XML
format, which we have to be able to convert in and out of:
\l The text in this switch's field-argument specifies the locale which
shall be used in conjunction with the specified bibliographic style to
format the citation in
Hi,
I'm making some minor changes to the ODF citation field that I hope
will be added soon. One change I want to make is to add control to the
local styling attribute. This is the flag that will say, for example,
suppress author, so that you get (1999) instead of (Doe, 1999).
My question
On Nov 25, 2006, at 6:16 AM, Gannon Dick wrote:
As I envision it, the RUST tag would exist as ad hoc protection for PII
(Personal Identifying Information). So, the easier it is to specify a
text block to be rusted the better.
I don't think there's any need for some specific new element for
On Oct 31, 2006, at 6:24 PM, Gannon Dick wrote:
a) ODF is authored in RELAX NG, which has far more power to validate
this sort of stuff than XSD.
The Dublin Core is authored in XSD or RDF, and both namespaces are
controlled by the W3C. I don't want to produce RELAX NG schema for
Dublin Core
On Oct 29, 2006, at 4:51 PM, Gannon Dick wrote:
With this validation, I was able to solve at least one of the problems
with a generic API for meta data. The validation constrains the XML
to a set of core DC elements (dc:title, dc:subject ...[6, I think])
and constrains the User Defined Name
On Oct 27, 2006, at 4:51 AM, juskenabble wrote:
Does anybody know where to find a specific xsd schema, which the open
document format part context.xml must comply ? I have been searching
for
quite a long time, but I havent found anything.
There is none; it's RELAX NG. Available from here:
On 10/24/06, Jakob Lechner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2006-10-23 at 10:58 -0400, Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
This is my opinion, but I think metadata in ODF should conform to a
common model. Otherwise, we end up with little islands of content that
are intelligible without dedicated code. I
From Dan Chudnov (library hacker):
http://onebiglibrary.net/story/open-office-rant-of-the-day
Does anybody know why OpenOffice ships with a bibliography database
that's *already* filled out with a bunch of records? Do they assume we
all want to write papers about OpenOffice?
And why, please
On Oct 23, 2006, at 1:18 PM, Andre Schnabel wrote:
There is really no need to rand a prefilled database. You could use
this databes to by some really usefull books about OOo that would have
explained how to delete those records.
Thanks for the explanation, but I hope you're joking here.
On 10/23/06, David Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Organisations could add macros to the document save process to force you to
add text. But I have see the results of such policies - long lists of swear
words in the catalogues and lots of aaa, bbb, acd etc. You can force people
to type it is
On 10/22/06, Gannon Dick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to prioritize RDF elements or are they all peers?
In RDF, you just have subject-predicate-object statements. So they are
indeed all peers.
The way to encourage certain expectations about those statements, it
seems to me, is to
On 10/20/06, Gannon Dick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a slightly different, but I think more practical, approach to
Meta Data in ODF documents.
Different and more practical than what?
I'm not able to access the documents in any case.
Bruce
On Oct 20, 2006, at 5:48 PM, Gannon Dick wrote:
I have a slightly different, but I think more practical, approach to
Meta Data in ODF documents.
OK, I managed to access the documents, but I really don't understand
what you're advocating. Metadata in ODF 1.2 will almost certainly use a
On Oct 9, 2006, at 1:08 AM, David Wilson wrote:
You may be aware that the Firefox bibliographic add-on Zotero is now
available
to the public and that it uses Bruce D'Arcus's CiteProc engine to
produce the
bibliographic table.
Corrections:
1) it does not use CiteProc; it uses the CSL
On Sep 26, 2006, at 5:51 PM, Leonard Mada wrote:
I come up with another idea regarding the standardisation of keywords.
I believe that the ultimate goal is to have standard keywords, too.
However, as this will be difficult, a possible solution is to let
users specify their own keywords.
FYI, David Wilson put up a wiki page to come up with suggested
enhancements to the OpenOffice bibliographic API.
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/
Bibliographic_API_Enhancements
I'm trying to find out about Microsoft's new citation and
bibliography API, but am not finding any
On 9/21/06, Jakob Lechner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 19.09.2006, 08:50 -0400 schrieb Bruce D'Arcus:
[...]
Can you give me some specific use case examples that might benefit
from such a generic structured metadata field? Citations is one. I
could imagine contacts would
Hi Jakob,
On Sep 4, 2006, at 4:23 AM, Jakob Lechner wrote:
Am Freitag, den 01.09.2006, 12:00 -0400 schrieb Bruce D'Arcus:
[...]
But what *is* a keyword in this context?
A keyword can be any word specified in a given smarttag library.
You're talking implementation. I'm asking a more basic
Peter, comment from one of the MS people on Brian Jones' blog:
Since Open XML is the default format for Office 2007, I don't think
that MS has changed a lot in the binary format and adapted the XML
format as an afterthought. So the reference for binary compatibility
would be Office 2003. Any
FYI, I just went through and cleaned up the main wiki page a bit:
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/
Bibliographic_Project%27s_Developer_Page#Remote_Server_Integration
Main changes are using the term citation field to refer to the new
citation support, to make clear exactly what it
It's occurred to me in looking at all this again that we need see where
we can simply use and/or enhance the existing bib APIs in OOo: to see
if we can disentangle what are GUI problems, from something fundamental
in the design.
It seems to me these APIs look fine:
Bibliography
On Jul 16, 2006, at 10:23 PM, pt wrote:
1. An external reference database / research tool that could be used
with
both Word and Writer. It should be able to store not jsut metadata but
full-text articles, notes, webpage snapshots other supporting data.
Right. I think this is slowly being
On Jul 16, 2006, at 5:38 AM, David Wilson wrote:
I read through the exchange and I think you put your position very
well and
the response was rather defensively or evasive.
I think it's worth paying close attention to what they've done not just
for interoperability's sake, but also
So based on back-and-forth with the product manager responsible for
the new bib support in Word 2007*:
1) they won't support footnote/endnote citations in v1
2) seems (?) they don't support first/subsequent distinctions in author-year
3) they think it perfectly fine to have styles implemented in
Not all that illuminating, but FYI:
http://blogs.msdn.com/joe_friend/archive/2006/07/13/664960.aspx
Bruce
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jul 10, 2006, at 7:33 PM, David Wilson wrote:
All other citations are footnote citation. This practise is is followed
because otherwise the text would have a couple of hundred very short
footnotes of the type - Táin LL 183
But does that really matter, or is this more a convenience for
On 7/10/06, David Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would this work? The Add/Edit citation has text input box with these options-
Custom Short title / Abbreviation (for this citation)
Custom Short title / Abbreviation (use for all subsequent citations)
(The first option is available in Ibidem.
I wonder if the easy way to do this is to remove all strings from CSL
files, define a list of variables, and allow them to be implemented
natively in software? That way the files are mostly simplified, and
remain self-contained. Doing that, I could also move the prefix and
suffix elements
On Jul 5, 2006, at 8:58 PM, James Howison wrote:
It occurs to me that one risk of not factoring out the language
specific aspects is that changes or improvements made in the 'base
styles' don't cascade to the other languages, leaving them to bit-rot,
especially if some non-compatible change
bib project questions ...
Re: David Wilson's idea that citeproc give pre-rendered citation and
bibliography chunks (first/subsequent, etc.) and save it in the XML,
described here:
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Citeproc_Writer_Interaction
I've thought about this some, and agree
Hey Peter,
On Jun 27, 2006, at 11:09 PM, pt wrote:
I disagree Bruce, about not storing rendered content in the XML. I
think it
needs to be stored in a rendered form.
If you don't then it will make it very hard to write things like
OpenDocument to HTML transforms in random languages as you
On Jun 26, 2006, at 9:46 PM, David Wilson wrote:
I would like to enter an issue to enhance database and text fields to
support
formatted text.
The Bibliographic project wants this enhancement because some data
fields in
the bibliography need to support formatted text. For example some
On Jun 24, 2006, at 10:33 PM, Matthew Yates wrote:
I added my two votes.
Great; we're now at 51.
Bruce
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jun 25, 2006, at 9:37 PM, Jon Rubin wrote:
On another question of Bruce's: no I would not give up a style editing
GUI. It's not just that I have no interest in hand coding XML (however
simple) but I don't think any of my colleagues would do either. 90% of
the time not editing the styles
I like the pledge idea too, though perhaps before doing that we ought
to come up with the most important tasks, and some rough target
amount?
Also, I wonder if a project like Edubuntu might not be helpful
someway? The homepage says they will be tragetting higher ed in the
future, and their
More explorations:
The Word 2007 bibliographic source editing GUI is all configured with
XML. There's a single file that includes all the information needed to
create the GUI, and then transform the results into the proper XML.
I've been saying for awhile that it'd be nice if OOo's XForms
On Jun 14, 2006, at 2:49 AM, David Wilson wrote:
y University's IT department distributes
OpenOffce for free, but the Academic departments recommend students use
Endnotes for bibliographic management.
Minor correction: Endnote, not Endnotes.
Until recently OpenOffice could claim to at least
On Jun 14, 2006, at 6:07 PM, Matej Cepl wrote:
That's nice, except that unless you will be done (who will implement
new ODF
citation support in OOo?), you will have no useable bibliographic
support
in OpenOffice.org, no users, and no push on Sun to do something about
it.
Right;
On Jun 14, 2006, at 7:33 PM, pt wrote:
Bruce, and others who have been helping, can you give the list an
update of where CSL and citeproc are at? I remember seeing some stuff
about Python and Ruby code, but didn't have much time to think about
it.
Hey, David just pinged me about this
I've been blogging a lot about the Word citation support; latest is
mostly about the GUI:
http://netapps.muohio.edu/blogs/darcusb/darcusb/archives/2006/06/13/
multi-reference-citations-in-word-2007
Bruce
-
To unsubscribe,
Sorry for cross-posting, but this is a fairly broad topic ...
I wonder, does what MS is doing with Word 2007 and OXML and citations
have any lessons for ODF and OOo?
They are a step away from implementing what we've been advocating for
the past couple of years for ODF and OOo (e.g.
On Jun 6, 2006, at 9:08 PM, Matt Price wrote:
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 06:26:57PM -0400, Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
Just found out today that MS is offering citation and bib support in
Word
2007.
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/
ms406055.aspx#office2007wordwhatsnew_othernewfeatures
Still
On 5/26/06, David Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree, I have these listed on the Developer wiki page. But we probably need
to add some step-by-step instructions. Otherwise it is a big task to sort out
what to do.
Yeah, I think we've started the process; just need to finish it. The
end
On 5/23/06, Matt Price [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there someone one might write to about the importance of this task?
I think if the coding team understood (a) the extent to which current
bibliographic functions block adoption by academics, and (b) the
importance of educational markets in
On 4/21/06, David Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I notice you have converted role (Author, Editor etc) from a table of role
types , in earlier models, to a field in Contributions in this model. I
think it there should be a table. Even if it was not linked into the database
it could used
On Apr 6, 2006, at 10:52 PM, Matej Cepl wrote:
Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
David and I both spent time working with FRBR, which you might be
interested in.
What's FRBR?
http://www.ifla.org/VII/s13/frbr/frbr.htm
http://purl.org/vocab/frbr/core
Bruce
On Apr 5, 2006, at 11:50 AM, Matt Price wrote:
should it be a little more extensive here? so for instnace: I am
extremely disorganized, and in the absence of a satisfactory
bibliogrpahic solution have dealt with various bibs in the last few
years. On one paper I use one bib, for another
On Apr 5, 2006, at 2:24 PM, Matthias Steffens wrote:
However, when I'm writing a paper, 95% of the cited references do
already exist in my bibliographic database and I want to use these
(and not a copy from somewhere else) since I know that I've verified
my own entries for correctness
On Apr 5, 2006, at 6:06 PM, Matthias Steffens wrote:
I'd also perhaps default to my database and user account, with
options to ping other servers if data is missing.
Yes, exactly!
Wouldn't that solve the problems with the best balance of concerns?
Yes.
So do the two yes responses
On Apr 5, 2006, at 6:59 PM, James Howison wrote:
I may be crazy, but has anyone considered building a
'proof-of-concept' _application_ that works similarly to the way
intended for OOo? Yes, developing it outside OOo, but using the
future file format as much as possible (obviously not doing
On Apr 4, 2006, at 3:46 PM, Matt Price wrote:
Seems to me it would be useful to define several targets --
say minimal, intermediate, and polished and lay out what needs to
be done for each.
Sure.
Minimal Bibliographic Interface
Target Goals: Allow expert users to insert useful citations
On Apr 4, 2006, at 9:58 PM, Matt Price wrote:
ah. that's really excellent, thank you. This also pointed me to
wiki/Bibliographic_Document_XML_Format which I had skimmed over
before, but is now much clearer to me.
FYI, I just changed the bib example to reflect the current direction of
I just went through and added comments throughout the requirements. I
do think it still could use a fair bit of editing and maybe
reorganization. I feel like we need to cut it down by about 50%, which
mostly means consolidating and sharpening.
It strikes me some of the requirements are in
On Mar 30, 2006, at 5:41 PM, Matt Price wrote:
Also very nice to have the Functional Requirements page up. I wonder
though whether it might not be a good idea to start prioritizing all
these tasks.
I agree. I think we need to first clean up the formatting, and then
work at streamlining
On 3/30/06, Matt Price [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My interest in porting citeproc to other languages is to prototype
this, and gain the experience we need to figure out how best to do
this.
can you expand on this? e.g. would it be helpful if I tried to work
up a python port (this will
On 3/27/06, David Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I assume to refers to the Bibliography xml structure which defines the
Bibliographic Tables' data fields, their order and their character formating
and punctuation between the fields. This structure is only indirectly
associated with
On Mar 25, 2006, at 10:11 PM, David Wilson wrote:
There is the case where some styles have a first (more detailed) and
subsequent (less detailed) format for citations.
Right, but that's a global issue. The citation code that CPH is working
on need not understand that.
It is important for
On Mar 25, 2006, at 11:11 PM, David Wilson wrote:
Some time ago, some one, it might have been CPHennessy, asked about
bibliographic table (reference table) generation and if the current
process
could work with the new Citeproc formating process.
I find worrying about the GUI at this
On Mar 25, 2006, at 9:09 AM, CPHennessy wrote:
The following two questions about the Citations which you can answer
will help
to make it clearer for me :
1 - currently the idea about citations is that the complete citation
appears
everywhere it is needed (e.g. it could be more than once thru
On Mar 25, 2006, at 10:33 AM, CPHennessy wrote:
In the new approach, those five citations each point to the same --
single -- metadata record, which is moved out of the content file into
its own dedicated file.
Ah, now this was not clear to me.
Good :-)
But the example docs you gave me
So if we take this:
On Mar 1, 2006, at 2:58 AM, Oliver Specht wrote:
Hi,
CPHennessy wrote:
This sounds quite interesting, is there already an example to play
with (even if it is another element)?
No, there isn't any example yet.
... and this (confusing, but the levels are
On Mar 2, 2006, at 7:49 PM, CPHennessy wrote:
OK, I now have some code using the DomBuilder (used in XForms) so that
I can parse and store the Citation in a DOM.
Excellent.
Now *all* I need to do is to properly associate this with a
Bibliography text field, and at a minimum to hook the
On Mar 1, 2006, at 5:01 PM, Matt Price wrote:
I guess where I want to go is to get rid of Endnote, and have a script
within Word and OOo that allows formatting of references from web
sources. Clearly that'll take some work though.
That sounds great -- though my preference would not be to get
On Feb 13, 2006, at 4:07 AM, Matthias Basler wrote:
I don't believe it to work in reality because styles are not necessary
defined
by an area of science, but often (also or only) by an institution or
journal.
If your intention is to ease looking up a style in a GUI I'd recomment
a
techniqe
On Feb 10, 2006, at 8:24 AM, Matthias Basler wrote:
Yes, abbreviations for journal names are quite common. Implementation
should not
be very difficult. In a simple case each user can him/herself define a
replacement (or alias) list
(i.e. Journal of Climatology - J. Clim.)
that can be switched
On Feb 9, 2006, at 4:37 AM, Matthias Basler wrote:
I'd definitely prefer the version below, for exactly this reason.
OK, then, I modified the schema and wrote an XSLT to mostly convert the
old examples.
For now I've put it all here:
http://www.users.muohio.edu/darcusb/citations/csl/
On Feb 8, 2006, at 6:12 PM, Johan Kool wrote:
Focus on getting it easily readable for your own parser, as well as
the human eye. If it works for that, it works for a GUI too.
OK, then, I think that's settled.
The final issue is about the prefix/suffix thing. Should they be plain
text (as
On 2/6/06, Jeffrey Lewis - UMDNJ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Im curious where the bibliography things are in development. Im curious
if there has been consideration into using a format similar to bibtex
for latex which specifies the fields for a given type of reference and
will format it based
I'm trying to get the python and ruby citeproc ports setup enough that
they can be put in CVS. I wonder if people have thoughts on how to
structure the code?
Right now I pretty much have a single module: CiteProc. That contains
the classes for both the citation metadata (Reference, Agent,
On Peter's point about parsing and serializing RDF: the discussion on
metadata at the TC is still up in the air, but it's occurred to me that
if we use a constrained RDF/XML, and consistently identify things with
URI's, then it should be easy to map back-and-forth to objects even
with just
Hi CPH,
Thanks for hanging with this.
On 1/30/06, CPHennessy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm obviously not asking the right questions of the developers on the SW
project (or it is possible that they are not listening).
It's probably a little of both. We have consistently had
communications
On Jan 30, 2006, at 11:06 PM, David Wilson wrote:
Following some help from Caolan McNamara
UNO: The writer UNO interface is typically implemented in
sw/source/core/unocore . That is a useful directory to see how UNO
stuff
gets mapped to it's core writer implementation. e.g.
On Jan 30, 2006, at 8:31 AM, Edward Summers wrote:
Heh, doesn't look like you need much help from me for programming :-)
Well, I did have help with some of the hard stuff. I had no clue how to
do the grouping and sorting stuff for the author-date class!
Still, I think it bears repeating
1 - 100 of 170 matches
Mail list logo
