Welcome Jatin,
It is nice to welcome you onboard.
I have sorted today the wiki-categories, see:
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Category:Bibliographic
So, there are some interesting pages out there, although the project was
quiet in the last month. [I was quiet a little bit longer,
Hi all,
David Wilson wrote:
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007, Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
So I'd like to see if we can work with developers from Zotero, JabRef,
etc. to enhance that baseline support. If out that some other
developer start to build the integrated tool we originally envisioned,
that's great. But
Hi David,
David Wilson wrote:
On Sun, 9 Dec 2007, Leonard Mada wrote:
I strongly suggest moving this page to a new location, something like:
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Bibliographic_Project/Plugins/
Zotero instead of creating such orphaned pages.
Leonard,
Thanks
Hi,
on another note, I have some questions regarding the following scenario:
Lets consider someone wants to review some movies (or some other AV-material).
[e.g. Roger Ebert wants to write a new movie guide ;-) ]
How does he cite the movies?
Should a special Audio-Video category exist? As
Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
Leonard Mada wrote:
...
Regarding document type, there are broadly 2 large categories of
documents, and therefore I am strongly against some of the droppibngs:
A. Peer-Reviewed Documents
B. NON-Peer-Reviewed Documents
So, you cannot mix everything in the article
Gannon Dick wrote:
Had to put my 2 cents here ...
Leonard, very good point but might it be better to use Evidence Basis
(ala' Evidence Based Medicine, Evidence Based Health Care, Evidence
Based Librarianship, etc.) as a Property of the resource no matter what
form or source the resource takes ?
Gannon Dick wrote:
My favorite: http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/coding/citationtags.htm
I missed this one, too. There is even more interesting information, e.g.
the Journal Tag Library explained, see:
http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/tag-library/2.2/index.html for the
details and also
In my previous post, I have suggested a different approach to the
current problem. What do you think of it?
Instead of having flags for every citation field, I suggested:
- have styles for citations
- AND allow more than one citation styles in the same document
-- styles are set globally
Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
But this all can get very tricky to deal with, particularly when you
consider things like substitution logic (what happens when there's no
author?), first/subsequent citations, and so forth. I worry how adding
this flexibility would impact implementations.
1. first/
.
Regards,
Leonard Mada
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
entry as described previously)
Just my thoughts.
Leonard Mada
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
German Schlagwort vs Stichwort
I do not know if there is an English equivalent for the two terms. I
believe you have in English only keywords, which are actually
Stichwoerter. Schlagwoerter would be some kind of keywords, too
(like used in Indices), but there is no distinction between the
12 matches
Mail list logo
