On Jun 14, 2006, at 2:49 AM, David Wilson wrote:
y University's IT department distributes
OpenOffce for free, but the Academic departments recommend students use
Endnotes for bibliographic management.
Minor correction: Endnote, not Endnotes.
Until recently OpenOffice could claim to at least
Quoting Bruce D'Arcus [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Jun 14, 2006, at 2:49 AM, David Wilson wrote:
Given this situation I propose that a fifth dot point be added to this
list-
[...]
In terms of the higher Education market bibliographic support is not
'feature', it is a strategic
Wow, this series of e-mails is depressing. I am a
professor at the University of Rochester and use
Openoffice daily, so along with Matt Price and Bruce
D'Arcus, there are at least a few people interested in
using Openoffice in academia. I've been following
this issue for some time (I'm the one
Quoting Matthew Yates [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I was really hopeful a year or so ago that better
bibliographic support would be built in by now.
As was I, and I should say that one of the reasons the current situation really
bums me out is that there are a number of python-based teaching projects I
David,
I like the pledge idea. Codeweavers set up something
similar where users can pledge money for a favorite
windows application. The Codeweavers developers can
then prioritize development to get new applications
functioning based on the pledges for it. When they
get it working, they
