Re: [dev-biblio] feedback needed on citation formatting

2007-03-21 Thread Gannon Dick
Simple is good :) I came up with a bit different solution, but the result is the same ... The 'biblio' table is actually selectable (there is a drop down box). Whichever table is selected last is used to populate the attributes of the text:bibliography-mark node. You can select either a

[dev-biblio] feedback needed on citation formatting

2007-03-20 Thread Bruce D'Arcus
It seems we're (finally!) about wrapped up with the ODF metadata work on which we'll base the new citation support. To make a long story short, we've realized that likely the easiest way to proceed with the details of formatting is that Writer has an API which knows how to track citations,

Re: [dev-biblio] feedback needed on citation formatting

2007-03-20 Thread David Wilson
On Wednesday 21 March 2007 7:39 am, Bruce D'Arcus wrote: I'm wondering about a simpler approach still. I am thinking of properties like just citation, shortCitation and bibliographicEntry. In that scheme, if we have a citation like (Doe, 1999, 2000; see also Smith, 1993): - ref 1 and 3

Re: [dev-biblio] feedback needed on citation formatting

2007-03-20 Thread Bruce D'Arcus
On Mar 20, 2007, at 7:12 PM, David Wilson wrote: A couple of questions come to mind- 1. Locator formatting (page numbers etc). If CiteProc is handling the locator formatting I would guess that intend that the RDF in package would look like: b:Book rdf:about=urn:isbn:34982376:123-128#An

Re: [dev-biblio] feedback needed on citation formatting

2007-03-20 Thread Bruce D'Arcus
On Mar 20, 2007, at 10:19 PM, David Wilson wrote: I am leaning towards not supporting traditional flags of this sort, with the idea that they're more trouble than they're worth, for both author and programmer. I am not sure what you mean precisely. Do you mean 'by not supporting traditional