Re: [dev-biblio] more on word support

2006-07-17 Thread Bruce D'Arcus
On Jul 16, 2006, at 10:23 PM, pt wrote: 1. An external reference database / research tool that could be used with both Word and Writer. It should be able to store not jsut metadata but full-text articles, notes, webpage snapshots other supporting data. Right. I think this is slowly being

Re: [dev-biblio] more on word support

2006-07-16 Thread David Wilson
I read through the exchange and I think you put your position very well and the response was rather defensively or evasive. David On Saturday 15 July 2006 10:52 am, Bruce D'Arcus wrote: So based on back-and-forth with the product manager responsible for the new bib support in Word 2007*:

Re: [dev-biblio] more on word support

2006-07-16 Thread Bruce D'Arcus
On Jul 16, 2006, at 5:38 AM, David Wilson wrote: I read through the exchange and I think you put your position very well and the response was rather defensively or evasive. I think it's worth paying close attention to what they've done not just for interoperability's sake, but also

Re: [dev-biblio] more on word support

2006-07-16 Thread David Wilson
On Sunday 16 July 2006 9:47 pm, Bruce D'Arcus wrote: And I think with some caveats, they will have met these goals. I am particularly intrigued by their no-local-database approach, where the editing forms are only editing XML data embedded in the file package. This is something we need to

[dev-biblio] more on word support

2006-07-14 Thread Bruce D'Arcus
So based on back-and-forth with the product manager responsible for the new bib support in Word 2007*: 1) they won't support footnote/endnote citations in v1 2) seems (?) they don't support first/subsequent distinctions in author-year 3) they think it perfectly fine to have styles implemented in