[jira] [Created] (BIGTOP-2588) Spark 2.0.1 installation fails

Amir Sanjar created BIGTOP-2588: --- Summary: Spark 2.0.1 installation fails Key: BIGTOP-2588 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BIGTOP-2588 Project: Bigtop Issue Type: Bug

Re: Bigtop Spark 2.0.1 installation Failure

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BIGTOP-2588 On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 8:30 AM, MrAsanjar . wrote: > will do > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 8:25 AM, Olaf Flebbe wrote: > >> Hi Amir, >> >> please open a JIRA with this error message. That's clearly a

Re: Bigtop Spark 2.0.1 installation Failure

will do On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 8:25 AM, Olaf Flebbe wrote: > Hi Amir, > > please open a JIRA with this error message. That's clearly a packaging > issue. > > Greetings, > Olaf > > > > Am 16.11.2016 um 08:17 schrieb MrAsanjar . : > > > > my team is reporting

[jira] [Created] (BIGTOP-2587) vagrant-puppet-vm fails with "Could not find class node_with_components"

Kengo Seki created BIGTOP-2587: -- Summary: vagrant-puppet-vm fails with "Could not find class node_with_components" Key: BIGTOP-2587 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BIGTOP-2587 Project: Bigtop

Re: Bigtop Spark 2.0.1 installation Failure

Hi Amir, please open a JIRA with this error message. That's clearly a packaging issue. Greetings, Olaf > Am 16.11.2016 um 08:17 schrieb MrAsanjar . : > > my team is reporting following failure during Spark 2.0.1 installation of > debian packages, has anyone else encounter

Bigtop Spark 2.0.1 installation Failure

my team is reporting following failure during Spark 2.0.1 installation of debian packages, has anyone else encounter such failure? same procedure works with Spark 1.6.2. Platform is Ubuntu-16.04 home/guest/bigtop_cluster/pkg_spark-2.0.1 + sudo RUNLEVEL=1 dpkg -i spark-core_2.0.1-1_all.deb

Re: Spark 1.x family support

hi, i think there is no point in enabling it for x86_64. olaf > Am 14.11.2016 um 19:05 schrieb MrAsanjar . : > > I have added and enabled Jenkins build for the new spark1 (spark 1.6.2) > component for ppc64le platform. I could do the same for x86 as well, any > objections?