Re: [DISCUSS] Move Bookkeeper Website from CMS to Jekyll (or other static generators)

Thank you, Enrico. I have a co-worker is helping with designing the website with Jekyll now. We will try to share with the community in a couple of days. - Sijie On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 12:22 PM, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > I read the wiki page and looks great. > Let's do

Re: [DISCUSS] Move Bookkeeper Website from CMS to Jekyll (or other static generators)

I read the wiki page and looks great. Let's do it. I am not sure about the push via gut works but I will be happy to try. If we approve this change I volunteer to do the migration if the website from subversion to git. Enrico Il gio 22 giu 2017, 05:31 Jia Zhai ha scritto: >

Re: [DISCUSS] Move Bookkeeper Website from CMS to Jekyll (or other static generators)

This is great to have a unified documentation place. On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 10:31 AM, Sijie Guo wrote: > FYI. I created a BP for this - > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=71012301 > > - Sijie > > On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 10:45 AM, Sijie Guo

Re: [DISCUSS] Move Bookkeeper Website from CMS to Jekyll (or other static generators)

FYI. I created a BP for this - https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=71012301 - Sijie On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 10:45 AM, Sijie Guo wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 10:20 AM, Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > >> Il lun 5 giu 2017,

Re: [DISCUSS] Move Bookkeeper Website from CMS to Jekyll (or other static generators)

On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 10:20 AM, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Il lun 5 giu 2017, 17:56 Sijie Guo ha scritto: > > > On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 3:07 AM, Flavio Junqueira wrote: > > > > > I don't have a super strong opinion here, but I'm not sure

Re: [DISCUSS] Move Bookkeeper Website from CMS to Jekyll (or other static generators)

Il lun 5 giu 2017, 17:56 Sijie Guo ha scritto: > On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 3:07 AM, Flavio Junqueira wrote: > > > I don't have a super strong opinion here, but I'm not sure I understand > > the concern. The textile files are stored in the repo, so any doc

Re: [DISCUSS] Move Bookkeeper Website from CMS to Jekyll (or other static generators)

On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 3:07 AM, Flavio Junqueira wrote: > I don't have a super strong opinion here, but I'm not sure I understand > the concern. The textile files are stored in the repo, so any doc changes > should be reviewed and committed as any other code change, no? Granted

Re: [DISCUSS] Move Bookkeeper Website from CMS to Jekyll (or other static generators)

I don't have a super strong opinion here, but I'm not sure I understand the concern. The textile files are stored in the repo, so any doc changes should be reviewed and committed as any other code change, no? Granted that it is in the hands of a committer to push the changes to the web site,

Re: [DISCUSS] Move Bookkeeper Website from CMS to Jekyll (or other static generators)

Our site is written using Textile, I found this https://github.com/jekyll/jekyll-textile-converter maybe the switch to Jekyll will be easy The other problem will be to switch the cms, maybe just a request to infra to switch to github pages will be enough Enrico 2017-06-03 19:15 GMT+02:00 Sijie

Re: [DISCUSS] Move Bookkeeper Website from CMS to Jekyll (or other static generators)

I don't think there is any enforcements from Apache INFRA side. You can use any technology for hosting website and documentation. I do see a lot of projects using Jekyll-like solutions for the website, where they typically have a separate XXX-site git repo and use gitpubsub (which is just a simply

Re: [DISCUSS] Move Bookkeeper Website from CMS to Jekyll (or other static generators)

It has been some time since you made this proposal, on some ticket. At the moment I did not make any concrete proposal because I wanted to study how to make the conversion. I am in favour of switching to a more popular sokution like jekyll and maybe markdown language Using git will be good as

[DISCUSS] Move Bookkeeper Website from CMS to Jekyll (or other static generators)

I'd like to raise another discussion about moving bookkeeper website from CMS to other static generators (e.g. Jekyll, Hugo). BookKeeper uses Apache CMS for generating the documentation and website [1]. The website source code is hosted at a svn repo, which now becomes obsolete from our current