[GitHub] bookkeeper issue #210: BOOKKEEPER-1100: Add Http Server for Bookkeeper

2017-06-28 Thread sijie
Github user sijie commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/210 @jvrao do you mind sending out your proposal. we might need to merge the efforts here, and also @eolivelli has some ideas on how to implement this with standard servlets. --- If your project is

[GitHub] bookkeeper issue #210: BOOKKEEPER-1100: Add Http Server for Bookkeeper

2017-06-28 Thread jvrao
Github user jvrao commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/210 We are adding REST endpoint to BookKeeper. I need to check if they overlap. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your

[GitHub] bookkeeper issue #210: BOOKKEEPER-1100: Add Http Server for Bookkeeper

2017-06-28 Thread sijie
Github user sijie commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/210 regarding the servlet, I agree with @eolivelli , we probably should define a standard API and allow it running with different web container. @yzang : do finagle and vertx support servlet? --- If

[GitHub] bookkeeper issue #210: BOOKKEEPER-1100: Add Http Server for Bookkeeper

2017-06-26 Thread eolivelli
Github user eolivelli commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/210 Some comments: 1) is it possible NOT to bundle all the implementations in bookkeeper-server project ? Or at least mark the dependencies as "provided" o "runtime" so that we do not

[GitHub] bookkeeper issue #210: BOOKKEEPER-1100: Add Http Server for Bookkeeper

2017-06-25 Thread yzang
Github user yzang commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/210 Found a few flaky/failing tests not related to this commit: Running org.apache.bookkeeper.meta.TestLongZkLedgerIdGenerator Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time

[GitHub] bookkeeper issue #210: BOOKKEEPER-1100: Add Http Server for Bookkeeper

2017-06-25 Thread jiazhai
Github user jiazhai commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/210 @yzang, Would you please help change the last part of this PR description a little? If you did the checks, put an "x" in the "[ ]". --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this