Re: ExplicitLAC consolidation

2019-02-11 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Il giorno lun 11 feb 2019 alle ore 06:03 Sijie Guo ha scritto: > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 6:09 AM Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri > wrote: > > > Thanks for bringing this up. To start with, can we put all forms on LAC in > > a doc? i.e we have more than one way to read and write LAC. > > 1. What are

Re: ExplicitLAC consolidation

2019-02-10 Thread Sijie Guo
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 6:09 AM Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri wrote: > Thanks for bringing this up. To start with, can we put all forms on LAC in > a doc? i.e we have more than one way to read and write LAC. > 1. What are the ways to send LAC to Bookies? > 2. What are the ways bookies store the LAC?

Re: ExplicitLAC consolidation

2019-02-10 Thread Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri
Thanks for bringing this up. To start with, can we put all forms on LAC in a doc? i.e we have more than one way to read and write LAC. 1. What are the ways to send LAC to Bookies? 2. What are the ways bookies store the LAC? 3. What are the ways client can learn about LAC and the interfaces and

ExplicitLAC consolidation

2019-02-10 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Hi Bookkeepers, I am trying to draw the best roadmap with the goal of consolidating ExplicitLAC feature. Currently I have two big topics: - on the reader side I would like enable new API users to leverage ExplicitLAC, transparently (no new configuration, now readflags, no explicit API calls) - on