> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks, Sijie and Matteo, for working on this. Even though I'd like to
> > see
> > > 4.4.0 out, if all it contains are bug fixes, then we shouldn't cut a
> new
> > > branch. What is it that you guys are planning on having that justifies
> >
t; see
> > 4.4.0 out, if all it contains are bug fixes, then we shouldn't cut a new
> > branch. What is it that you guys are planning on having that justifies
> > cutting a new branch?
> >
> > -Flavio
> >
> > > On 14 Mar 2016, at 06:16, Sijie Guo <s
ains are bug fixes, then we shouldn't cut a new
> branch. What is it that you guys are planning on having that justifies
> cutting a new branch?
>
> -Flavio
>
> > On 14 Mar 2016, at 06:16, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hello:
> >
> &
<si...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hello:
>
> Matteo and I had a discussion about releases. Release 4.4.0 is kind of
> taking too long. So we'd like to cut release 4.4.0 based on whatever we
> have that are marked for 4.4.0, targeting on end of this month. Matteo
> wo
-Original Message-
From: Sijie Guo [mailto:si...@apache.org]
Sent: 10 August 2015 01:43
To: dev@bookkeeper.apache.org
Subject: Release 4.4.0
Hi folks:
I'd like to come up a list of major items for 4.4.0. Then we should start
planning the release for 4.4.0
Here are the major items that I have
Hi folks:
I'd like to come up a list of major items for 4.4.0. Then we should start
planning the release for 4.4.0
Here are the major items that I have in my mind:
- last-add-confirmed long poll (BOOKKEEPER-670)
- delay ensemble change (BOOKKEEPER-759)
- bunch of bookie storage improvements
How about
Enhance client API (BOOKKEEPER-860)?
On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Sijie Guo si...@apache.org wrote:
Hi folks:
I'd like to come up a list of major items for 4.4.0. Then we should start
planning the release for 4.4.0
Here are the major items that I have in my mind:
-
BK-860 is currently marked for 4.4.0, but I agree with Ivan that we shouldn't
block the release on it. It doesn't stop you from working on it, though, and if
we are able to converge fast enough, then I don't see a reason for not having
it in, Jvrao.
-Flavio
On 09 Aug 2015, at 22:23, Ivan
This list looks good to me. +1
-Ivan
On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 7:42 PM Sijie Guo si...@apache.org wrote:
Hi folks:
I'd like to come up a list of major items for 4.4.0. Then we should start
planning the release for 4.4.0
Here are the major items that I have in my mind:
- last-add-confirmed
Enhance client API (BOOKKEEPER-860)?
I think this change is hasn't been fleshed out enough for this release. The
other changes that Sijie suggested are all about 80-100% done already.
-Ivan
Ah. I see. Thanks for the clarification.
On Sunday, August 9, 2015, Ivan Kelly iv...@apache.org wrote:
This list looks good to me. +1
-Ivan
On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 7:42 PM Sijie Guo si...@apache.org javascript:;
wrote:
Hi folks:
I'd like to come up a list of major items for 4.4.0.
11 matches
Mail list logo