Re: Precommit Jobs - don't we merge to master before tests ?

On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 12:32 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Il giorno mar 24 lug 2018 alle ore 09:25 Sijie Guo ha > scritto: > > > I am not sure need this configuration. > > > > based on my understanding, if we are using `${sha1}`, jenkins will use > > Github

Re: Bookkeeper 4.8 plans

Done. Have sent most of the PRs that I think needed for 4.8. - Sijie On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 1:44 AM Sijie Guo wrote: > I just checked my local branches. I have a few changes regarding table > service might be needed for 4.8.0, which I would like to include them as > part of 4.8.0 &g

[ANNOUNCE] Apache BookKeeper 4.7.2 released

The Apache BookKeeper team is proud to announce Apache BookKeeper version 4.7.2. Apache BookKeeper is a scalable, fault-tolerant, and low-latency storage service optimized for real-time workloads. It has been used for a fundamental service to build reliable services. It is also the log segment

Re: Starting release procedure for BookKeeper 4.8.0

On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 10:24 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Hi, > I am going to prepare the first RC for BookKeeper 4.8.0. > I think branch-4.8 is ready to go. > +1 > > Please check if you have last minute fixes to add to 4.8 and ping me. > > I am preparing the release notes, it will take time,

Re: Starting release procedure for BookKeeper 4.8.0

On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 10:58 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Il giorno gio 6 set 2018 alle ore 07:55 Sijie Guo ha > scritto: > > > On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 10:24 PM Enrico Olivelli > > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > I am going to prepare the first RC f

[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache BookKeeper Release 4.7.2, release candidate #0

The release is approved with 4 +1 binding votes: - Enrico Olivelli - Ivan Kelly - Matteo Merli - Sijie Guo - Sijie On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 1:37 AM Sijie Guo wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Please review and vote on the release candidate #0 for the version 4.7.2, > as follows: >

Re: Starting release procedure for BookKeeper 4.8.0

Enrico, How's going with 4.8.0 release? It seems being paused? - Sijie On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 12:43 AM Sijie Guo wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 10:58 PM Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > >> Il giorno gio 6 set 2018 alle ore 07:55 Sijie Guo ha >> scritto: >>

Re: BookKeeper usecases webpage

+1 for updating that. It might be good to keep hdfs there and add twitter manhattan (links to the blog post) and herdb - Sijie On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 8:36 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > I see on this page that we are saying that BK has some usecases >

Re: [DISCUSS] ExplicitLAC on the reader's side

+1 On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 1:11 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Hi, > Now that Charan is working on making ExplicitLAC persistent I would like to > start the discussion about merging the reader side view of LAC (ExplicitLAC > + Pibbybacked/regular LAC) > > Major points: > - Now (4.8) ExplicitLAC is

Re: BP-26: Move distributedlog library into bookkeeper

On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 3:44 AM, Enrico Olivelli - Diennea < enrico.olive...@diennea.com> wrote: > Il giorno ven, 19/01/2018 alle 13.17 -0800, Sijie Guo ha scritto: > > Hi all, > > I started a BP for proposing merging distributedlog library as part of > bookkeeper.

Re: Help with bad errors on 4.6.1

Enrico, I would suggest you applied my fixes and then debug from there. In this way, you will have a better sense where the first corruption is from. Sijie On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 11:48 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Il ven 9 mar 2018, 19:30 Enrico Olivelli

Re: Release 4.7.0

might be a bit busy on March. Jia will help me with some of the tasks and do the actual release work. - Sijie On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 10:52 PM, Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > We have about one month to cut release 4.7.0. Please go through the issues > you f

Re: Help with bad errors on 4.6.1

keeperProtocol$ReadResponse. > >> (BookkeeperProtocol.java:9975) > >> > at > >> > org.apache.bookkeeper.proto.BookkeeperProtocol$ReadResponse$ > >> 1.parsePartialFrom(BookkeeperProtocol.java:10869) > >> > at > >> > org.apache.b

[DISCUSS] Set `ENABLE_DIGEST_TYPE_AUTODETECTION` to true as default value

Hi all, I am raising a discussion to set `ENABLE_DIGEST_TYPE_AUTODETECTION' to true to turn on this feature by default. because `digest type` has been recorded in ledger metadata since 4.5, it is better for client to use the digest type recorded in ledger metadata. Here is a proposal of the

Re: [DISCUSS] Set `ENABLE_DIGEST_TYPE_AUTODETECTION` to true as default value

ning >of what is tested ? >3. we should add a test about this change, at least on the new API > > Replied on the PR. > > Enrico > > > > 2018-03-13 8:41 GMT+01:00 Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com>: > > > Hi all, > > > > I am ra

Re: Help with bad errors on 4.6.1

On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 1:24 AM, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > 2018-03-15 12:02 GMT+01:00 Enrico Olivelli : > > > > > > > 2018-03-15 11:13 GMT+01:00 Ivan Kelly : > > > >> > What is the difference in Channel#write/ByteBuf pooling.in Java

Re: Help with bad errors on 4.6.1

On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 2:26 AM, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Thank you Sijie, > I have already applied a similar patch to my local code based on 4.6.1 but > the problem remains. > What do you mean "the problem" here? Do you mean the corruption problem or the leaking problem?

Re: Intro to git worktree

yes. worktree is what you needed when you have multiple concurrent tasks in progress. have been using it for long time. - Sijie On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 2:23 AM, Ivan Kelly wrote: > Hi folks, > > I just wanted to point out the git "worktree" command. I stumbled > across last

Re: Meeting Agenda (03/08/2018)

to say. > > > > About code coverage reports there is not so much from my point, I am > > waiting for 4.8 start, same for the separation of client sode code from > > server side code. > > > > For BP14 I am still in 'pause' but we need to revert part of BP18 as the

Re: Replication Worker and targetBookie.

On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 8:07 AM, Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri wrote: > On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 2:38 AM, Ivan Kelly wrote: > > > > Given that RackAwareEnsemble policy defaults to finding a replacement > > > bookie within > > > the same rack, when a bookie is lost

Re: Replication Worker and targetBookie.

On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 11:46 AM, Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri <jujj...@gmail.com > wrote: > On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 11:33 AM, Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 8:07 AM, Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri < > > jujj...@gmail.com> > > wr

Re: Help with bad errors on 4.6.1

Sent out a PR for the issues that I observed: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/1240 On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 10:47 PM, Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> wrote: > So the problem here is: > > - a corrupted request failed the V3 request decoder, so bookie switched to > use

Meeting Agenda (03/08/2018)

Hi all, Here is the agenda : https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/2018-03-08+Meeting+Agenda Please add any items that I am missing here. I can not attend the meeting this week. Feel free to go without me. Major updates from me is about 4.7.0 release. I am delaying 4.7.0

Re: Meeting Agenda (03/08/2018)

> > Cheers > Ivan > > On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 10:46 AM, Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Here is the agenda : > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/ > 2018-03-08+Meeting+Agenda > > > > Please add any

Meeting Agenda (2018-04-05)

Hi all, Sorry that I forgot to send out the meeting agenda earlier this week. But here is the agenda link: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/2018-04-05+Meeting+Agenda Please take a look and add the topics that you would like to discuss. - Sijie

Re: Meeting Agenda (2018-04-05)

, Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 11:28 PM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Sijie, >> If you are going to attend out would be interesting to have an overview >> about PTable. >> I

Re: 4.7.0 Release

AM, Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> wrote: > FYI. I am going to cut branch-4.7 and start the process for 4.7 release. > > - Sijie > > On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 12:36 PM, Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I am going to creat

Re: Meeting Agenda (2018-04-05)

some time after 4.7.0 released. We still have a few task pending for it, so would be better to do after that. - Sijie > > Enrico > > Il gio 5 apr 2018, 02:38 Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > > > Hi all, > > > > Sorry that I forgot to send out the meeti

[VOTE] Apache BookKeeper Release 4.7.0, release candidate #0

only ships a precompiled linux JNI lib along with the artifact. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes. Thanks, Sijie Guo [1] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/1330 [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/

Re: [VOTE] Apache BookKeeper Release 4.7.0, release candidate #1

packages checksum ( asc and sha1 all good) > > - the source package build and test all run successfully. > > - in both binary package(server & all), bin/bookkeeper and command > localbookie runs well. > > > > > On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 3:55 AM, Sijie Guo <guosi..

Re: [VOTE] Apache BookKeeper Release 4.7.0, release candidate #1

Done. Thanks Jia! - Sijie On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 11:53 PM, Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 9:26 PM, Jia Zhai <zhaiji...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Sijie, >> would you please update the the sha1 files? >&

[VOTE] Apache BookKeeper Release 4.7.0, release candidate #1

only ships a precompiled linux JNI lib along with the artifact. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes. Thanks, Sijie Guo [1] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/1330 [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/

Re: Vote on bk 4.7.0 #1

Good point. However I am not sure it is needed. first, DL is just a library module of BK. After merge, we should think it as a whole project, it is not a *separate* project/subproject any more. second, releaseNotes is in the vote email, which already clarify releasing DL. that is people should

Re: 4.7.0 Release

FYI. I am going to cut branch-4.7 and start the process for 4.7 release. - Sijie On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 12:36 PM, Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I am going to create branch-4.7 and start the 4.7.0 release process this > week. If you have any issues n

Re: Updated branch-4.6 to 4.6.3-SNAPSHOT....sorry

Looks good. On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 7:21 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > I am sorry, > instead of pushing the update of version from 4.6.2-SNAPSHOT to > 4.6.3-SNAPSHOT on branch-4.6 to my github repo (in order to create a PR) I > have pushed it directly to Apache (GitHub) repo.

Re: [VOTE] Apache BookKeeper Release 4.7.0, release candidate #0

n scheme name at > index 0: "zk+hierarchical://localhost:2181/ledgers" > at java.net.URI$Parser.fail(URI.java:2848) > at java.net.URI$Parser.checkChars(URI.java:3021) > at java.net.URI$Parser.checkChar(URI.java:3031) > at java.net.URI$Parser.parse(URI.java

[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache BookKeeper Release 4.7.0, release candidate #1

I'm happy to announce that we have unanimously approved this release. There are 4 approving votes, 4 of which are binding: * Enrico Olivelli * Jia Zhai * Matteo Merli * Sijie Guo There are no disapproving votes. Thanks everyone! - Sijie On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 12:55 PM, Sijie Guo <gu

Release 4.8.0

Hi all, Release 4.7.0 is closed today and is about to be announced in 1-2 days or so. Now the development is on 4.8.0. Is anyone interested in managing releasing 4.8.0? it would be great if any committers who haven't done any release help out :) - Sijie

community meeting

Hi all, Forgot to send out the meeting agenda earlier this week. Here is the meeting agenda : https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/2018-04-19+Meeting+Agenda 4.7.0 is also done. docker image is built and will announce tomorrow. Please add any items to discuss in the wiki page.

Re: [VOTE] Apache BookKeeper Release 4.7.0, release candidate #1

Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 12:55 PM, Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Please review and vote on the release candidate #0 for the version 4.7.0, > as follows: > [ ] +1, Approve the release > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific commen

Official Docker Images

Hi all, Current docker images are auto-built by apache docker account. It becomes a bit problematic in the release process. We might consider moving the docker build process out of apache main repo. So I am restarting the discussion about "official docker image", following what flink is doing.

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache BookKeeper Release 4.7.0, release candidate #1

and proceed the remaining tasks for completing 4.7.0. - Sijie On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 11:45 PM, Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm happy to announce that we have unanimously approved this release. > > There are 4 approving votes, 4 of which are binding: > > * Enrico

Re: OrderedScheduler and OrderedSafeExecutor

> > > On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 11:16 AM Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 8:38 AM, Matteo Merli <mme...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > While profiling the allocations of a BookKeeper client (from current > > > mast

Re: OrderedScheduler and OrderedSafeExecutor

On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 8:38 AM, Matteo Merli wrote: > While profiling the allocations of a BookKeeper client (from current > master) writing entries, I've noticed that there are multiple allocations > per entry related to the OrderedScheduler. > > I think OrderedScheduler was

Re: [VOTE] Apache BookKeeper Release 4.6.2, release candidate #0

On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 12:07 AM, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > 2018-04-03 4:13 GMT+02:00 Jia Zhai : > > > Hi Enrico, > > Thanks for the work. Seems this asc file has some error: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/bookkeeper/ > >

4.7.0 Release

Hi all, I am going to create branch-4.7 and start the 4.7.0 release process this week. If you have any issues need to be included at 4.7.0, please label them as 4.7.0. - Sijie

[DISCUSS] Update some default values

Hi all, I went through the bookkeeper configuration file to see if there are any settings we should change their default values for most of the installations. Here I would like to raise a discussion about two settings: - `journalRemoveFromPageCache`: this settings is false. but it should be

Re: [DISCUSS] Inconsistency in Handle based APIs - Specifically "close"

On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 12:50 AM, Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 6:37 PM, Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > It is not a blocker for me. > > > > But if we want consistency, either applying pattern "asyncXYZ()" or

Re: [DISCUSS] Inconsistency in Handle based APIs - Specifically "close"

It is not a blocker for me. But if we want consistency, either applying pattern "asyncXYZ()" or "xyzAsync()" for async operations works for me. - Sijie On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 4:20 AM, Ivan Kelly wrote: > Hi folks, > > I'm currently changing some parts of pulsar to use the

Re: Drop md5 from release procedure

Thank you. I found the email now. If this is a request from ASF, let's update the release procedure to drop md5 part and also update the downloads page. - Sijie On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 2:36 AM, Ivan Kelly wrote: > > Can you forward the discussion thread if there is one? > >

Meeting Agenda (2018-03-22)

Hi all, I put up the draft for the meeting agenda. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/2018-03-22+Meeting+Agenda - 4.7.0 release is delayed because we are doing various testing on BK 4.7 to catch issues before cutting the release. - added a topic about the issues Enrico

Re: Drop md5 from release procedure

On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 4:10 PM, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Hi, > According to recent updates Can you forward the discussion thread if there is one? > to ASF policy (1) we should stop distributing > md5 checksums. We should change the release guide (2) and drop

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: distributedlog-nightly-build #593

the DL repo is using bookkeeper snapshot and have some classes using PackageLimited classes, when those classes change, it will break the build. since we already move the DL core to bookkeeper, we can stop the DL jenkins jobs. - Sijie On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 11:13 PM, Enrico Olivelli

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: distributedlog-nightly-build #593

Disabled the jenkins jobs. - Sijie On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 1:28 AM, Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> wrote: > the DL repo is using bookkeeper snapshot and have some classes using > PackageLimited classes, when those classes change, it will break the build. > > since we alread

Re: Pulsar now using standard Apache BookKeeper

Awesome work, Ivan & Jia! Congrats Pulsar community! - Sijie On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 9:53 AM, Matteo Merli wrote: > In Pulsar master branch, we have switched the BookKeeper dependency from > the Yahoo fork to the 4.7.0-SNAPSHOT version of BookKeeper from main master >

Re: Apache ASF Slack vs BookKeeper Slack

On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 5:33 AM, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Hi, > I had a recent discussion on d...@maven.apache.org about Slack channels. > It seems that there is an "official" Slack place of Apache Projects and > Olivier Olamy (in copy in this email) suggested to move to

Re: Apache ASF Slack vs BookKeeper Slack

On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 6:27 AM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2018-02-28 15:25 GMT+01:00 Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com>: > > > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 5:33 AM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > >

Re: Next community meeting

Here is the meeting notes (thank you Enrico for writing this) : https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/2018-06-28+Meeting+Notes On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 12:35 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > This is the agenda > >

Re: Community Meeting

I can help On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 9:23 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Hi, > tomorrow we will have the Community Meeting. > > I won't attend because Italy it is holiday and I will be on vacation > > Anyone can draft the Agenda and drie the meeting ? > > Enrico >

Re: Community Meeting

I put up an agenda link. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/2018-11-01+Meeting+Agenda On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 9:43 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Il giorno mer 31 ott 2018 alle ore 17:41 Sijie Guo > ha scritto: > > > > I can help > > Great > Tha

Re: [CANCELLED] Re: [VOTE] Release 4.8.1, release candidate #0

:06 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Il ven 9 nov 2018, 17:47 Sijie Guo ha scritto: > > > Enrico, it seems that you didn’t use the release scripts to cut the > > release? > > > > All was automatic with the script. > The problem comes if you build from sources. >

Re: Missing Apache BookKeeper 4.8.0 artifacts from Maven Central

That was an email from Oct 4 On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 5:01 AM Ivan Kelly wrote: > Wow. Suprised we're only hearing about it now > > -Ivan > > On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 1:14 PM, Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > Now it is okay > > https://search.maven.org/search?q=g:org.apache.bookkeeper > > > > Cheers >

Re: [CANCELLED] Re: [VOTE] Release 4.8.1, release candidate #0

Enrico, it seems that you didn’t use the release scripts to cut the release? Sijie On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 8:13 AM Enrico Olivelli - Diennea < enrico.olive...@diennea.com> wrote: > Thank you Ivan for reporting this. > Please create an issue so that we can continue the discussion and provide > a

Re: BookKeeper Board report draft - due to today

LGTM +1 - Sijie On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 10:21 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Hi all, > > We have a board report due today. Here is a draft. Please take a look and > let me know what you think. > > - > > ## Description: > > BookKeeper is a scalable, fault-tolerant,

Re: Community meeting tomorrow

On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 10:26 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Hi BookKeepers ! > tomorrow we will 'meet' on hangout for the usual Community Meeting. > It is the place to discuss current projects around BookKeeper. > > https://bookkeeper.apache.org/community/meeting/ > > We are going to release

Re: BookKeeper Community Meeting

Sorry I couldn’t join the meeting today :( Sijie On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 6:51 AM Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri wrote: > Mine is iffy. If I can, I will join around 8:15 > > On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 12:48 AM Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > Hi > > I have created the wiki page for the meeting > > > > > >

Re: Weird Problem with merge script Sijie was reported as author of my commit

packages. > > ### Changes > > Add 'optional' dependency wherever it is needed (all GRPC > artifacts for instance) > > Master Issue: #1710 > > > > > Author: Sijie Guo > Author: Enrico Olivelli > > Reviewers: Ivan Kelly > > This closes #1725 from eolivelli/fix/jdk11-add-annotations-api >

Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to JDK11 - drop JDK9 CI Jobs ?

+1 on dropping java9 and supporting java 11 Just one comment, I remember there was a performance penalty in netty using java 9, you have to turn some flags on. Is that still true on using java 11? Sijie On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 7:22 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Hi, > I am working on support for

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache BookKeeper 4.8.0 released

Congrats! Well done, Enrico. - Sijie On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 4:27 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > The Apache BookKeeper team is proud to announce Apache BookKeeper version > 4.8.0. > > Apache BookKeeper is a scalable, fault-tolerant, and low-latency > storage service optimized for > real-time

Re: Release schedule for 4.9.0

On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 4:19 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Hi, > As 4.8.0 has been released (mail to annou...@apache.org) will be sent > soon we have to think about a schedule for 4.9.0. > > I will update the website once we agree on a timeline > https://bookkeeper.apache.org/community/releases/ >

Re: [DISCUSSION] PIP 24: Simplify memory settings

the proposal looks good to me. just out of curiosity, why PoolingPolicy only has `UnpooledHeap` and `PooledDirect`? - Sijie On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 12:51 PM Matteo Merli wrote: > (CCed dev@bookkeeper.apache.org since this proposal is referring to both > projects and I thought it might be good

Re: [DISCUSSION] PIP 24: Simplify memory settings

On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 4:13 PM Matteo Merli wrote: > On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 4:03 PM Sijie Guo wrote: > > > the proposal looks good to me. > > > > just out of curiosity, why PoolingPolicy only has `UnpooledHeap` and > > `PooledDirect`? > > > > I thin

Re: Bookkeeper 4.9...

97 > > We can release 4.9 without such docs by if someone in the community has > some cycle it will be a great step forward for the adoption of this new > features > > Cheers > > > Enrico > > > > Il mar 15 gen 2019, 03:19 Sijie Guo ha scritto: > > > As

Re: Bookkeeper 4.9...

gt; > > > Sijie, > > If you prefer I can take this. > > Most of the work is from you and Ivan > > > > No problem for me. > > Thank you > > Enrico > > > > Il gio 27 dic 2018, 10:53 Sijie Guo ha scritto: > >> > >> Since no one volunte

Re: Clusterwide vs Client configuration for metadata format version

On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 11:31 PM Ivan Kelly wrote: > Hi folks, > > A discussion has arisen about on [1] about the ledger layout changes > I've made recently [2]. > The change[2] adds a field maxLedgerMetadataFormat to the cluster-wide > managed ledger layout. When a new ledger is created, this

Re: Clusterwide vs Client configuration for metadata format version

On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 7:24 PM Ivan Kelly wrote: > > I don't fully understand how the cluster-wide version work here, > specially > > how do clients react when people use the tool to bump the version in > ledger > > layout. > > Clients don't have to react immediately. The cluster-wide setting

Re: Bookkeeper 4.9...

Since no one volunteers for being release manager, I will take this round then. - Sijie On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 2:13 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Hi Bookkeepers ! > Any plan to volunteer for being release manager of 4.9 ? > > I will be happy to help any one who wants to try for the first

Re: Release 4.7.3

those issues above. From pulsar's perspective, Pulsar 2.2.1 needs 4.7.2. Thanks, Sijie On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 1:11 AM Ivan Kelly wrote: > What's the driving bugfix for cutting 4.7.3? > On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 11:54 PM Sijie Guo wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > &g

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.7.3, release candidate #0

+1 (binding) from me as well. On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 2:52 AM Sijie Guo wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Please review and vote on the release candidate #0 for the version 4.7.3, > as follows: > [ ] +1, Approve the release > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide

Re: Errors while buding docker image for 4.8.1

On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 11:51 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Hi, > On Docker hub there is some problem in building 4.8.1 tag > > build on "latest" (which is 4.8.1 succedeed) > https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/bookkeeper/builds/bd6ndfczwnwtz2bdg7rgslm/ > > but for tag 4.8.1 failed >

[ANNOUNCE] Apache BookKeeper 4.7.3 released

The Apache BookKeeper team is proud to announce Apache BookKeeper version 4.7.3. Apache BookKeeper is a scalable, fault-tolerant, and low-latency storage service optimized for real-time workloads. It has been used for a fundamental service to build reliable services. It is also the log segment

Re: Release 4.7.3

release for Pulsar ? > yes. we don't do major version upgrade in a minor release. > > Enrico > > > -- > > Enrico Olivelli > Software Development Manager @ Diennea - MagNews > Tel.: (+39) 0546 066100 - Int. 125 > Viale G.Marconi 30/14 - 48018 Faenza (RA) > >

[VOTE] Release 4.7.3, release candidate #0

Hi everyone, Please review and vote on the release candidate #0 for the version 4.7.3, as follows: [ ] +1, Approve the release [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments) The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes: * Release notes [1] * The

Release 4.7.3

Hi all, I would like to cut a 4.7.3 release late this week. If you have any fixes to include in 4.7.3, please label those issues as 4.7.3, then I will make sure they are included. - Sijie

Re: Dropping 'stream' profile

On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 10:42 AM Ivan Kelly wrote: > > There is no decision made. However I am -1 to drop stream profile, as I > > have explained in may different threads that I have been mentioned. > > Where were these threads? I did a search in github and the list, but > couldn't see anything.

Re: Dropping 'stream' profile

Thank you for creating the issue. Created a quick fix for `standalone`: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/1823 Integration tests requires some cleanup to refactor the structure. - Sijie On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 11:33 AM Ivan Kelly wrote: > > Yes. That is a problem but it is not

Re: Dropping 'stream' profile

ganization of the code structure should be fixed. > > I'll hold off from voting on the RC until there's a concrete plan to > resolve all this. > > -Ivan > On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 10:11 AM Sijie Guo wrote: > > > > Actually let's hold on this change for now. > > > &

Re: Release 4.7.3

FYI. cutting release 4.7.3 On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 12:07 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > +1 > > > > > Il giorno gio 22 nov 2018 alle ore 05:15 Jia Zhai ha > scritto: > > >  > > > > On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 6:54 AM Sijie Guo wrote: > > > > >

***UNCHECKED*** Re: [VOTE] Release 4.8.0, release candidate #0

On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 3:54 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Il giorno mar 18 set 2018 alle ore 11:41 Ivan Kelly ha > scritto: > > > Hey Enrico, > > > > Thanks for putting this together. Afraid it's -1 from me though. > > > > The new binaries pull in grpc, which has a notice file which we are > >

Re: Dropping 'stream' profile

> > Enrico > > Il giorno lun 13 ago 2018 alle ore 09:57 Ivan Kelly ha > scritto: > > > +1 for dropping the profiles. > > > > On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 12:24 AM, Sijie Guo wrote: > > > I have no problem with this proposal. I am fine with dropping the > &

Re: Clusterwide vs Client configuration for metadata format version

On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 9:11 PM Ivan Kelly wrote: > > If it is client level configuration, in theory it is possible to have > latest client create v3 ledger while bookies are still running in the older > version right? > > Yes, autorecovery would likely just break in this case. > > > If we go

Re: Can we drop this ? Jenkins build is still unstable: bookkeeper_release_branch_46 #251

We don’t have EOL policy yet. I would prefer us defining EOL before deleting any CI jobs On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 10:36 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Does it makes sense to keep this Job active ? > > We have 4.7 and 4.8 active branches and we have master on 4.9 > > I am not sure about EOL policy

Re: EnsemblePlacementPolicy exposes third party API "Pair" from commons-lang3 in a public API

On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 8:40 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Hi all, > while reviewing 4.9 release I found this problem around a change about > EnsemblePlacementPolicy > > this is the issue > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues/1914 > > The problem is that in public API we should not use

[VOTE] Release 4.9.0, release candidate #1

Hi everyone, Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version 4.9.0, as follows: [ ] +1, Approve the release [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments) The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes: * Release notes [1] * The

[DISCUSS] Release 4.10.0 Planning

Hi all, Since we are in the progress of releasing 4.9.0, I think it is a good time to start the discussion of what we are going to do for 4.10.0. Here are a few list of tasks I have in my mind: - Complete a few ongoing BPs * BP-27: New BookKeeper CLI `bkctl`. * BP-36: Stats annotations *

Re: Tags, version numbers and docker

On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 2:44 AM Ivan Kelly wrote: > Hi folks, > > Looking at doing the final tasks for the 4.8.2 release and stuck on > the docker bit. It's not that I don't see what has been done before, > but more that what is there is so so wrong. > > Take 4.8.1 release for example. The

Fwd: Projects Can Apply Individually for Google Season of Docs

FYI. -- Forwarded message - From: Sijie Guo Date: Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 1:58 PM Subject: Fwd: Projects Can Apply Individually for Google Season of Docs To: Dev FYI. Now projects can apply individually for Google Season of Docs. We should just apply this. - Sijie

Re: Tags, version numbers and docker

I am fine with it if there is someone pushing the process forward. - Sijie On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 4:12 AM Jia Zhai wrote: > +1 for ivan's idea > > Best Regards. > > > Jia Zhai > > Beijing, China > > Mobile: +86 15810491983 > > > > > On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 6:55 PM Enrico Olivelli > wrote: >

Re: How to handle stale metadata?

On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 4:22 AM Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri wrote: > Recently we ran into a situation where the LedgerMetadataListener never > returned/detected metadata change. Due to this reader had stale metadata > and tried to read from bookies that no longer have that ledger, hence >

Re: DL LogReader.readNext blocked forever

On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 6:37 PM Lothruin Mirwen wrote: > Hi BookKeepers! > > I have an issue with DL LogReader.readNext(false) [ie: blocking] > > Such call should "block until return a record if there are records in the > stream (aka catching up). Otherwise it would wait up to {@link >

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >