Build failed in Jenkins: brooklyn-master-build #1117

See -- [...truncated 3.29 MB...] 2017-06-13 01:00:18,902 WARN Task Task[sensor s4bn2ctgq1:entity.children.removed]@TDnpoODt is being finalized before completion 2017-06-13

[GitHub] brooklyn-server pull request #732: Adds brooklyn-container-service code

GitHub user grkvlt opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-server/pull/732 Adds brooklyn-container-service code See [IP clearance details](http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/brooklyn-container-service.html) for further details. You can merge this pull

[GitHub] brooklyn-server issue #721: DynamicFabric: add support for firstMemberSpec

Github user aledsage commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-server/pull/721 @rdowner agree with @drigodwin - code looks good, but would be good to have a test similar to `DynamicClusterTest.testDifferentFirstMemberSpec` (see

[GitHub] brooklyn-server pull request #727: Fix SoftwareProcessEntityFeedRebindTest

Github user aledsage closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-server/pull/727 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the

[GitHub] brooklyn-server pull request #717: Fix/disable failing integration tests

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-server/pull/717 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the

[GitHub] brooklyn-server issue #727: Fix SoftwareProcessEntityFeedRebindTest

Github user aledsage commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-server/pull/727 Closing; instead merged https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-server/pull/717 which has the same fix. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply

[GitHub] brooklyn-server pull request #730: Use enricher spec instead of constructor

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-server/pull/730 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the

Jenkins build is back to normal : brooklyn-server-master #626

See

[RESULT][IP CLEARANCE] Apache Brooklyn - Container Service

With no -1 votes being cast, this IP Clearance vote passes by lazy consensus. Further information on merging and code status will be posted on the dev@brooklyn.apache.org list. Thanks, Andrew. On Thu, 8 Jun 2017 at 10:50 Richard Downer wrote: > Apache Brooklyn is receiving

[GitHub] brooklyn-server pull request #729: Use PolicySpec instead of policy construc...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-server/pull/729 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the

[GitHub] brooklyn-server issue #720: Fail the build on purpose

Github user neykov commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-server/pull/720 @bostko It doesn't, see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-14302 for discussion. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on

[GitHub] brooklyn-server issue #720: Fail the build on purpose

Github user bostko commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-server/pull/720 @neykov how did you verify Jenkins merges the branch to master before building? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as

[GitHub] brooklyn-server issue #720: Fail the build on purpose

Github user asfgit commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-server/pull/720 Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://builds.apache.org/job/brooklyn-server-pull-requests/2301/ --- If your project is set up for it,

[jira] [Resolved] (BROOKLYN-516) WindowsPerformanceCounterSensors does not start on rebind

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BROOKLYN-516?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Valentin Aitken resolved BROOKLYN-516. -- Resolution: Fixed > WindowsPerformanceCounterSensors does not start on rebind >

[GitHub] brooklyn-server issue #720: Fail the build on purpose

Github user asfgit commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-server/pull/720 Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://builds.apache.org/job/brooklyn-server-pull-requests/2300/ Build failure. --- If your project

Build failed in Jenkins: brooklyn-server-master #625

See -- [...truncated 7.39 MB...] setUp(org.apache.brooklyn.rest.resources.SensorResourceTest) Time elapsed: 30.219 sec <<< FAILURE! java.lang.RuntimeException: More than one

[GitHub] brooklyn-server issue #720: Fail the build on purpose

Github user neykov commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-server/pull/720 retest this please --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and

[GitHub] brooklyn-library pull request #116: Test jenkins integration

GitHub user neykov reopened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-library/pull/116 Test jenkins integration You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/neykov/brooklyn-library test-jenkins Alternatively you can

[GitHub] brooklyn-server issue #725: Rename to AbstractRebindHistoricTest

Github user drigodwin commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-server/pull/725 This looks fine, thanks @aledsage --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this

[GitHub] brooklyn-server pull request #725: Rename to AbstractRebindHistoricTest

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-server/pull/725 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the

[GitHub] brooklyn-client issue #54: Fixed setting config. Added setting sensors

Github user asfgit commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-client/pull/54 Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://builds.apache.org/job/brooklyn-client-pull-requests/139/ --- If your project is set up for it, you

[GitHub] brooklyn-client pull request #54: Fixed setting config. Added setting sensor...

GitHub user Graeme-Miller opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-client/pull/54 Fixed setting config. Added setting sensors You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/Graeme-Miller/brooklyn-client

[jira] [Commented] (BROOKLYN-440) More efficient thread usage for ssh execution

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BROOKLYN-440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16046538#comment-16046538 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on BROOKLYN-440: - Github user neykov commented on the issue:

[GitHub] brooklyn-server issue #731: BROOKLYN-440: ssh not use StreamGobbler for logg...

Github user neykov commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-server/pull/731 retest this please --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and

[GitHub] brooklyn-server issue #720: Fail the build on purpose

Github user neykov commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-server/pull/720 retest this please --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and

[GitHub] brooklyn-docs pull request #196: Adding docs for Windows on Azure ARM

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-docs/pull/196 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature

[GitHub] brooklyn-docs pull request #196: Adding docs for Windows on Azure ARM

GitHub user ygy opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-docs/pull/196 Adding docs for Windows on Azure ARM You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/ygy/brooklyn-docs docs/winrm Alternatively you can