All,
I've create a PR to make this change
https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-server/pull/544
Could someone please review it.
thanks
Duncan
On Thu, 19 Jan 2017 at 17:32 Aled Sage wrote:
> +1
>
> I don't know of anyone who would be negatively impacted by the defaults
>
+1
I don't know of anyone who would be negatively impacted by the defaults
changing from ubuntu to centos.
---
Switching from ubuntu 14.04 to 16.04 as the default ubuntu might well
break some blueprints though (as I've seen examples that just use
`osFamily: ubuntu`, without an explicit
Agree with Mark McKenna's proposal to make it configurable.
No strong opinion on what the default value should be, though. Maybe Ubuntu
14.04, for compatibility with blueprints that assume Ubuntu. Any examples
of those in the wild?
Guglielmo Nigri
Senior Engineer @ Cloudsoft Corporation
On 19
Duncan,
Do we have any data on what our users are using? That should be our driver
for change :-)
I am a bit concerned what effect making this change would have on existing
blueprints that don't specify an OS requirement. If a user writes such a
blueprint and makes it Ubuntu-dependent, would a
Makes sense I guess; there have been some issues with Ubuntu 16.04 (at
least with Vagrant) so Centos as default might be better than Ubuntu 16?
On Thu, 19 Jan 2017 at 15:37 Aleksandr Vasilev <
aleksandr.vasi...@cloudsoftcorp.com> wrote:
> I'm in favor of adding Ubuntu 16.04 and CentOS 7 with
I'm in favor of adding Ubuntu 16.04 and CentOS 7 with score setting higher
than previous versions.
Best Regards,
Aleksandr Vasilev
DevOps Engineer | Cloudsoft Corporation
On 20 January 2017 at 00:17, Duncan Godwin
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Should we change the