Re: LICENSE file questions - MIT, binary, process

2018-07-17 Thread Geoff Macartney
I'll have a look tomorrow Thomas Cheers Geoff On Tue, 17 Jul 2018, 16:29 Thomas Bouron, wrote: > Hi all. > > Alex went the extra mile[1] and revamped how we generate the LICENSE and > NOTICE files for Brooklyn projects, thanks for this Alex! > I went through it and it looks good to me.

[GitHub] brooklyn-dist issue #123: New license procedure

2018-07-17 Thread ahgittin
Github user ahgittin commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-dist/pull/123 Thanks @tbouron . Re YAML, yes, it should all be YAML, unobtrusively so, so it seems friendly for a person to look at, but also easy for consuming projects and people to analyse /

[GitHub] brooklyn-dist issue #123: New license procedure

2018-07-17 Thread tbouron
Github user tbouron commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-dist/pull/123 One question though @ahgittin, is it expected that `NOTICE` and `LICENSE` file are now in a YAML format? ---

[GitHub] brooklyn-dist issue #123: New license procedure

2018-07-17 Thread tbouron
Github user tbouron commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-dist/pull/123 @ahgittin LGTM, although it's very hard to do a throughout review with that amount of changes. I would like to have a second pair of eyes on this to verify it but I would be happy to merge.

Build failed in Jenkins: brooklyn-master-build-docker #534

2018-07-17 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See -- Started by upstream project "brooklyn-library-master-docker" build number 260 originally caused by: Started by timer [EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables.

Jenkins build is back to normal : brooklyn-library-master-docker #260

2018-07-17 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See