Re: [DISCUSSION] Kubernetes Helm

Firstly I'd like to make it clear that I *do* appreciate the work that Andrea has done here! I never want to turn down a good contribution, and this is a good contribution, so I'm very reluctant but have to agree with Thomas that the Helm PRs should be reverted (as I'm sure that Thomas was very

Re: [DISCUSSION] Kubernetes Helm

hi all, just to check what is the resolution on this, is the k8s-helm location going to be left out of Brooklyn, and done in a community repo? regards Geoff On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 at 14:03 Andrea Turli wrote: > Thomas, > > thanks for taking care of this. > > Geomacy, > >

Re: [DISCUSSION] Kubernetes Helm

Thomas, thanks for taking care of this. Geomacy, I've built brooklyn-{server,dist} on OSX and ran it from CentOS 7 and it works fine as I think `os-maven-plugin` is doing the right incantation Richard, I think helm is a well appreciated tool for kubernetes ecoystem. I think I can donate my

[DISCUSSION] Kubernetes Helm

Hi Brooklyners. You might have noticed that the Brooklyn builds started to fail more than usual recently. I spent some time last week to fix those issues but I just realised that there is a deeper one with the recent change I merged (about Kubernetes Helm) This change requires a dependency,