[GitHub] brooklyn-server issue #516: [WIP] Feature/test karaf features

2017-01-13 Thread googlielmo
Github user googlielmo commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-server/pull/516 I should have clarified the (somewhat limited) scope of this PR in the first place, thank you for giving me the occasion to do it @geomacy 🙂 --- If your project is set up for it,

[GitHub] brooklyn-server issue #516: [WIP] Feature/test karaf features

2017-01-13 Thread geomacy
Github user geomacy commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-server/pull/516 @googlielmo I guess that seems sensible, just wondered if you knew about them. thanks --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub

[GitHub] brooklyn-server issue #516: [WIP] Feature/test karaf features

2017-01-13 Thread googlielmo
Github user googlielmo commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-server/pull/516 hi @geomacy, yes I'm aware of that; as these are actually unit tests (not integration tests), the idea is to test the `brooklyn-server` features at every build, to spot regressions early

[GitHub] brooklyn-server issue #516: [WIP] Feature/test karaf features

2017-01-13 Thread geomacy
Github user geomacy commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-server/pull/516 hi @googlielmo do you know there are pax exam tests for karaf in brooklyn-dist? If I recall correctly, the tests are there because they are testing the whole of brooklyn (not just