Re: PR for BROOKLYN-597

2019-12-10 Thread Thomas Bouron
Hey Goeff. FYI, the docker image I created [1] is only to build Brooklyn. I didn't mean to make it compatible for the release-make.sh However, having one for the release-make.sh script to work fine is IMO a great idea. [1] https://github.com/apache/brooklyn/blob/master/Dockerfile On Mon, 9 Dec

Re: PR for BROOKLYN-597

2019-12-09 Thread Geoff Macartney
Hi Richard, Thanks for the mail; I'm building on OSX, surely I shouldn't need the gcc toolchain? I can build Brooklyn ok with mvn clean install, it's just failing when I run the release make script. I think you're right, the Dockerfile we have just does a build. Maybe creating one for the

Re: PR for BROOKLYN-597

2019-12-09 Thread Richard Downer
Geoff, Possibly unrelated, but I've had an experience getting Brooklyn to build recently (haven't tried for many months!) There's a Dockerfile which spins up a container with all the required dependencies for a *build* - I'm not sure if it has everything required for a *release* build though.

PR for BROOKLYN-597

2019-12-08 Thread Geoff Macartney
Hi all, Per our chat about prepping for 1.0.0 I have created https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-dist/pull/150 to remove MD5 and SHA-1 from the signing process. I've marked it Do Not Merge because I can't get the make-release-artifacts.sh to work to test this. It keeps failing on