On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 12:14 -0500, Daniel Spiewak wrote:
Is it worth to provide an overview over the built in tasks (compile,
package, clean, ...), or at least mention, that buildr -T is very
helpful?
I think we mention buildr --help somewhere in the document (or maybe it's in
the
I think we mention buildr --help somewhere in the document (or maybe it's
in
the install guide). I think that listing the available tasks would just
add
extra noise though. You were the one who wanted to trim things down!
:-)
You've got me there :)
What about mentioning buildr -T?
forgive my ignorance, but how exactly does buildr do that? i can see that
you can download a file from a given url, but where is the code that digs
into a zip to extract a jar from it?
Don't ask me how Buildr does it, but somehow... Probably just on the
strength of Assaf's brilliance. The
On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 12:35 -0500, Daniel Spiewak wrote:
forgive my ignorance, but how exactly does buildr do that? i can see that
you can download a file from a given url, but where is the code that digs
into a zip to extract a jar from it?
Don't ask me how Buildr does it, but
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Ittay Dror itt...@tikalk.com wrote:
Assaf Arkin wrote on 07/30/2009 12:15 AM:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Martin Grotzke
martin.grot...@javakaffee.de wrote:
On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 12:35 -0500, Daniel Spiewak wrote:
forgive my ignorance, but how
I didn't know there's a part like that.
Really? That's odd, but it works though! :-) I had always thought that
was what you were saying with that DOJO example. Based on that code, I
tried it out using DBPool, and everything magically worked.
Daniel
For what it's worth, I've done a similar download, unzip, find the jars,
compile with the jars job in a project last year... I didn't feel like
creating artifacts for all the jars included in Eclipse BIRT... and it
looked like:
BIRT_WAR = artifact(org.eclipse.birt:birt-webapp:war:2.3.0)
def
I don't see a problem with leaving this patch on for all platforms -- at
least until JRUBY-3381 is resolved. Moving across devices requires a fully
copy anyway, so it's not like the workaround is any less efficient.
Daniel
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:38 PM, vbo...@apache.org wrote:
Author: