If we do this, then our build depends on the Scala compiler. Is that what
we want?
Daniel
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 10:48 AM, boisv...@apache.org wrote:
Author: boisvert
Date: Mon Sep 28 15:48:55 2009
New Revision: 819606
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=819606view=rev
Log:
Remove
It doesn't work? Have you tried compiling using scalac's -target:jvm-1.4
option?
Daniel
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 10:47 AM, boisv...@apache.org wrote:
Author: boisvert
Date: Mon Sep 28 15:47:36 2009
New Revision: 819603
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=819603view=rev
Log:
Comment out
Yes.
Without -target:jvm.1.4 option it works,
boisv...@sixtine:~/svn/buildr-java$ /opt/boisvert/scala-2.7.5/bin/scalac
/home/boisvert/svn/buildr-java/lib/buildr/scala/org/apache/buildr/SpecsSingletonRunner.scala
but with -target:jvm-1.4 option it fails:
boisv...@sixtine:~/svn/buildr-java$
For the release builds, we've been creating .class files with JVM 1.4
compatibility target so far... except for the SpecsSingleRunner I guess
since it was checked-in already (and the other bug I'll mention in the next
email).
alex
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Alex Boisvert
Looks like it was a bug introduced in
http://github.com/apache/buildr/commit/88ff51503689480aa38b5ad666e6d6d02ab05cf4
Working on it... the fix seems to cause spec failures.
alex
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Rhett Sutphin rh...@detailedbalance.netwrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to test out a
H. From a practical standpoint, I think it already does depend on it.
Even if the .class files are there, we would rely on timestamps being intact
to avoid the dependency (since we have tasks to recompile .scala files) and
based on recent experience, I don't think we can rely on timestamps
On Sep 28, 2009, at 12:40 PM, Alex Boisvert wrote:
Fixed.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDR-322
Thanks, Alex. I'll hopefully be able to test it later today.
Rhett
alex
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Alex Boisvert alex.boisv...@gmail.com
wrote:
Looks like it was a bug
