Re: svn commit: r833834 - in /buildr/trunk: lib/buildr/scala/tests.rb spec/scala/tests_spec.rb

2009-11-07 Thread Alex Boisvert
According to Bill Venners, ScalaTest will be updated soon. (I was going to report the issue earlier today but somebody else beat me to it) Until we find a combination that works for all frameworks, my vote would be to revert to Specs 1.6. And one request: please run the specs when upgrading vers

Re: svn commit: r833834 - in /buildr/trunk: lib/buildr/scala/tests.rb spec/scala/tests_spec.rb

2009-11-07 Thread Daniel Spiewak
We need to make a decision here. ScalaCheck 1.5 is incompatible with Specs 1.6.1. We could stick with Specs 1.6, but there are a lot of very useful fixes and improvements in 1.6.1, including several which I require for my projects. I guess ideally ScalaTest would update to support ScalaCh

Re: Bug in linking additional test-folder?

2009-11-07 Thread Alex Boisvert
Ok, I've gone ahead and implemented dependency/ordering between extensions (before_define / after_define)* à la Rake*. https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=833791 alex On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 7:44 AM, Alex Boisvert wrote: > (Moving to dev@) > > This issue is due to how extensions