See http://192.168.1.42:/job/Buildr%20CI%20on%20Windows/6/changes
Changes:
[toulmean] partial fix for BUILDR-445: relax rspec dependency
--
[...truncated 3862 lines...]
D:/Documents and Settings/Administrator/.hudson/jobs/Buildr CI on
Applying the patch in BUILDR-447 would squash quite an annoying bug :)
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Pepijn Van Eeckhoudt
pepijn.vaneeckho...@luciad.com wrote:
Which issues are still blocking the 1.4.0 release? I might have some time
available to work on some of them, so I would like to know
See http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/buildr-ci-build-jruby/2/
--
[...truncated 3626 lines...]
- should not change existing list of sources
- should include as classpath dependency
- should compile a simple .scala file into a .class file
- should
See http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/buildr-ci-build-jruby/3/changes
Changes:
[toulmean] partial fix for BUILDR-445: relax rspec dependency
--
[...truncated 3530 lines...]
[31m at
See http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/buildr-ci-build-jruby/4/
--
[...truncated 3534 lines...]
[31m at
org.jruby.internal.runtime.methods.DefaultMethod.call(DefaultMethod.java:156)[0m
[31m at
Hi Pepjin,
we have spec failures on Windows, and it looks like we reproduce 2 spec
failures with jruby on ubuntu.
We have nightly builds on Windows, can you see my email with the failures ?
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 02:18, Pepijn Van Eeckhoudt
pepijn.vaneeckho...@luciad.com wrote:
Which issues
I will install Scala on the Windows machine and will change the message to
get the full build log.
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 00:08, anto...@lunar-ocean.com wrote:
See http://192.168.1.42:/job/Buildr%20CI%20on%20Windows/6/changes
Changes:
[toulmean] partial fix for BUILDR-445: relax rspec
Win XP or Win 7 have failures. How much they overlap is yet to be
determined... but if you get to fix _anything_ on Windows, that's a great
step.
We're not far from having everything in check.
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 09:41, Pepijn Van Eeckhoudt
pepijn.vaneeckho...@luciad.com wrote:
Still
Ok. I've run the specs and I'm getting 31 failures now on Windows XP.
I'll have a look at them next week.
Pepijn
On 28/5/2010 18:46, Antoine Toulme wrote:
Win XP or Win 7 have failures. How much they overlap is yet to be
determined... but if you get to fix _anything_ on Windows, that's a
First failure I checked was this one:
it 'should not touch target directory unless running' do
mkpath 'target' ; File.utime @early, @early, 'target'
@filter.from('src').into('target').exclude('*').run
File.mtime('target').should be_close(@early, 10)
end
Can this ever work? On many
Can you maybe pipe these to another list and have people opt-in? If
there's going to be a continuous stream of Hudson build emails, I'll
probably drop off the buildr dev list.
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 2:08 AM, anto...@lunar-ocean.com wrote:
See
Hey, you're not going to not read those emails, are you :) ?
Yes, I will ask for the creation of a new list. That might not happen before
a week though.
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 10:50, Daniel Spiewak djspie...@gmail.com wrote:
I second the motion. Gmail filters work wonders, but it's still
Buildr CI on Windows - Build # 7 - Still Failing:
Full build log:
[...truncated 3865 lines...]
D:/Documents and Settings/Administrator/.hudson/jobs/Buildr CI on
Windows/workspace/lib/buildr/core/application.rb:622:in `invoke_with_call_chain'
D:/Documents and
Buildr CI on Windows - Build # 8 - Still Failing:
Full build log:
${BUILD_LOG, 1}
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2751
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 12:04, Antoine Toulme anto...@lunar-ocean.comwrote:
Oh ok. Hudson only sends emails when build is failing OR on the first build
where the build is successful again.
So it should be less noise hopefully.
On Fri, May
15 matches
Mail list logo
