On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 20:47 -0700, Alex Boisvert wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 8:29 PM, Daniel Spiewak wrote:
>
> > >
> > > Everything in Buildr is an extension added on to project, if first_time
> > > decided to stop working, so would compiling, testing, packaging, etc.
> >
> >
> > That's part
On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 17:47 -0700, Alex Boisvert wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Martin Grotzke > wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 11:01 -0700, Alex Boisvert wrote:
> > > Oh and I was perusing the repo and saw your sloccount.rb extension... I'm
> > > guessing it's still a work-in-progr
Oh, I see. I checked earlier but I missed that. That's the issue then.
Thanks!
alex
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Assaf Arkin wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 8:45 PM, Alex Boisvert
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 8:20 PM, Assaf Arkin wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 7:31 P
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 8:45 PM, Alex Boisvert wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 8:20 PM, Assaf Arkin wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Alex Boisvert
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I've managed to narrow down the issue to the
> > > Buildr::Extension::ClassMethods.callbacks method which returns an
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 8:29 PM, Daniel Spiewak wrote:
> >
> > Everything in Buildr is an extension added on to project, if first_time
> > decided to stop working, so would compiling, testing, packaging, etc.
>
>
> That's part of why I don't understand Martin's bug. We *know* that
> first_time is
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 8:20 PM, Assaf Arkin wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Alex Boisvert
> wrote:
>
> > I've managed to narrow down the issue to the
> > Buildr::Extension::ClassMethods.callbacks method which returns an invalid
> > Callback instance. I came up with a quick fix but I'm
>
> Everything in Buildr is an extension added on to project, if first_time
> decided to stop working, so would compiling, testing, packaging, etc.
That's part of why I don't understand Martin's bug. We *know* that
first_time is working, otherwise everything would be broken. However, the
issue
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Alex Boisvert wrote:
> I've managed to narrow down the issue to the
> Buildr::Extension::ClassMethods.callbacks method which returns an invalid
> Callback instance. I came up with a quick fix but I'm not sure why this is
> happening or if it's the right solution.
I've managed to narrow down the issue to the
Buildr::Extension::ClassMethods.callbacks method which returns an invalid
Callback instance. I came up with a quick fix but I'm not sure why this is
happening or if it's the right solution.
boisv...@sixtine:~/svn/buildr-ext$ svn-diff
Index: lib/buildr/
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Martin Grotzke wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 11:01 -0700, Alex Boisvert wrote:
> > Oh and I was perusing the repo and saw your sloccount.rb extension... I'm
> > guessing it's still a work-in-progress and wanted to point out that it
> would
> > be better to allocat
I can reproduce the problem (and your solution). It still doesn't make any
sense to me though. Actually, it's probably indicative of some deeper
problem with the way we're using Rake. Assaf, I'm getting well out of my
depth here, could you look at this?
Daniel
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 4:59 PM, M
I did this:
module LinesOfCode
include Extension
desc "WeirdWeirdWeird"
Project.local_task('loc')
first_time do
# Define task not specific to any project.
#Project.local_task('loc')
end
...
end
And now buildr -T shows the loc task as "WeirdWeirdWeird"...
Just for interest:
That doesn't make any sense to me. I've done a number of extensions now
using local_task, none of them have had any problems. Just looking at your
sources, everything should work. Just for kicks, try moving the local_task
bit *out* of the first_time block, see what happens.
Daniel
On Mon, Aug
On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 11:01 -0700, Alex Boisvert wrote:
> Oh and I was perusing the repo and saw your sloccount.rb extension... I'm
> guessing it's still a work-in-progress and wanted to point out that it would
> be better to allocate a new SloccountConfig in before_define instead of
> having a sin
Ok, thanks for the hint! However, using `task` doesn't change anything
for me. buildr -T still prints the available loc tasks as myproj:loc and
myproj:mysubproj:loc. Invoking `buildr loc` results in
Don't know how to build task 'loc'
Removing the first_time stuff also doesn't change anything, I
Oh and I was perusing the repo and saw your sloccount.rb extension... I'm
guessing it's still a work-in-progress and wanted to point out that it would
be better to allocate a new SloccountConfig in before_define instead of
having a single configuration instance across all projects.
My (unsolicited
You should use `task` rather than `define_task`. I think that's probably
the root of all your problems. My changes can be seen here:
http://github.com/djspiewak/buildr-addons/tree/master
Daniel
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Martin Grotzke <
martin.grot...@javakaffee.de> wrote:
> Here's the
Here's the loc extension (loc.rb):
http://github.com/magro/buildr-addons/tree/master
Cheers,
Martin
On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 11:29 -0500, Daniel Spiewak wrote:
> That really doesn't make any sense. Could we see the full sources?
>
> Daniel
>
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 4:58 AM, Martin Grotzke > wr
That really doesn't make any sense. Could we see the full sources?
Daniel
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 4:58 AM, Martin Grotzke wrote:
> And I noticed that with the example one has to invoke
> buildr myproj:loc
> for the project or
> buildr myproj:mysubproj:loc
> for a subproject.
>
> The
> firs
And I noticed that with the example one has to invoke
buildr myproj:loc
for the project or
buildr myproj:mysubproj:loc
for a subproject.
The
first_time do
Project.local_task('loc')
end
seems to have no effect.
Is this intended?
Cheers,
Martin
On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 11:47 +0200,
Hi,
I just want to create a sloccount extension and for this started with
the loc example.
I had to do minor changes, which I applied to the extending.textile:
http://github.com/magro/buildr/commit/b880acaca4892a4000143d089b59873247808bc0
Without these changes:
- the task is not shown with build
21 matches
Mail list logo
