In current codebase, we actually never allows syntax like
SELECT *
FROM TT
because of 2 reasons:
1. The parser does not allow table function calls without parenthesis
2. SqlConformace.allowNiladicParentheses default returns false
In TableFunctionTest, I try to register the same name table and
xzh_dz created CALCITE-4373:
---
Summary: Count(distinct Col) materialized view recognition failed
Key: CALCITE-4373
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4373
Project: Calcite
Issue
Vladimir Sitnikov created CALCITE-4372:
--
Summary: Correct specification getCumulativeCost and
getNonCumulativeCost so it should always produce non-nullable value
Key: CALCITE-4372
URL:
Vladimir Sitnikov created CALCITE-4371:
--
Summary: TableMacro and TableFunction should have List rather than List parameters
Key: CALCITE-4371
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4371
Something like that. I guess if TT is a function with zero parameters
and also a table, then does TT in the following refer to the function
or the table?
SELECT *
FROM TT
Note that the TT function doesn't even have to be a table function.
Table functions are functions, and so are in the same
Thanks Julian ~
> Possibly, but I'd be cautious, because the semantics become ambiguous
if there are name clashes.
Assumes there is a table named TT and a table function named TT(param_a,
param_b), they are under the same namespace, do you mean
"FROM TT(param_a, param_b)" or "FROM TT(TABLE TT,
